Articulated Chair Back Structure for Balanced Tilt Support

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional office chairs lack individual adjustability of the seat and backrest, leading to inadequate support and comfort for users of varying sizes and postures, with tilting mechanisms that do not provide a balanced ride throughout the range of motion.

Innovation Solution

A seating structure with an articulated seat and backrest, featuring a linkage assembly that allows the rear portion of the seat to pivot independently, an adjustable seat depth mechanism, and a biasing system with a leaf spring and cam surfaces to provide balanced torque and visual indicia for adjusting the return force.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If the seat and backrest are made as rigid fixed components, then structural strength is improved, but adaptability to different users and postures deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural strengthVSAvoidadaptability to different users
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The seat is divided into front and rear portions that can articulate relative to each other, allowing independent movement. The backrest is segmented into multiple sections with different articulation capabilities. This segmentation enables both structural integrity and adaptability to different user sizes and postures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces dynamic articulation mechanisms that allow the seat and backrest to move and adjust during tilting. The seat portions can rotate relative to each other, and the backrest sections can independently articulate, providing continuous adaptation to user needs while maintaining strength through controlled mechanical movements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Adaptability or versatility

If the seat depth is adjusted by moving the entire rigid seat, then seat depth adjustability is improved, but structural complexity and risk of pinching deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveseat depth adjustabilityVSAvoidstructural complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The seat is segmented into front and rear portions connected by an articulation mechanism. Adjusting seat depth involves moving only the front portion relative to the rear portion, rather than moving the entire seat. This reduces the complexity of the adjustment mechanism and eliminates pinch points that would occur with full-seat movement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Ease of manufacture

If the backrest is made as a rigid fixed component, then manufacturing simplicity is improved, but user comfort and range of motion deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing simplicityVSAvoidrange of motion
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The backrest is divided into multiple sections that can articulate independently. The lower, middle, and upper portions can move relative to each other, allowing users to stretch and arch their backs while maintaining a relatively simple overall structure that is easier to manufacture than a fully complex mechanism.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

4Ease of operation

If conventional springs are used to bias the seat and back, then tilting function is achieved, but device complexity and adjustment difficulty increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetilting functionVSAvoidmechanism complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines the biasing function with the articulation mechanism itself. The linkage assembly that enables seat portion movement also provides the restoring force through its geometric configuration, eliminating the need for separate complex spring mechanisms and reducing overall device complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution ensures comfortable support for users by reducing hip drop, allowing customizable fit, and providing a balanced ride and easy adjustment, eliminating the need for additional support members and simplifying the tilting mechanism.

Implementation Method 1

The mechanisms used to adjust the load on the spring(s), or the load capability of the spring(s)

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElasticity: Elasticity

Implementation Method 2

The spring and body support structure have cam surfaces that contact one another

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCam mechanism: Cam

Data Source

PatentUS8960796B2Back construction
Publication Date: 2015.02.24 MILLERKNOLL INC
  • US8960796B2 patent drawing
  • US8960796B2 patent drawing
  • US8960796B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A seating structure includes a central spine and an upper back structure having a pair of arms extending upwardly and outwardly from the central spine. The upper back structure is pivotally connected to the central spine about a first horizontal axis. A back support structure is pivotally connected to the spine about a second horizontal axis and is pivotally connected to the ends of each of the arms about a third horizontal axis.