Transformable Chair-Desk Structure With Stable Folding Locks

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing transformable furniture designs lack reliable fixing and locking mechanisms, leading to instability and limited functionality when converting between chair and desk configurations.

Innovation Solution

A transformable furniture design featuring two plates connected by a hinge joint, rotating around horizontal axes, and supported by a construction of at least three interconnected folding elements with sliding and locking mechanisms, allowing precise positioning and deformation for enhanced stability and functionality.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If a folding supporting construction with two frames is used, then the furniture can transform between chair and desk positions, but the stability and reliability of the construction deteriorates due to lack of reliable fixing and locking mechanisms

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetransformation capabilityVSAvoidstability
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The supporting construction is divided into multiple folding elements (at least three) that can be independently controlled and locked. This segmentation allows each element to be fixed in specific positions during transformation, providing reliable stability while maintaining the overall transformation capability between chair and desk configurations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The supporting construction incorporates dynamic locking mechanisms that enable the folding elements to be fixed in different positions. The locking mechanism allows the construction to transition from a dynamic (movable) state during transformation to a static (fixed) state during use, ensuring stability in both chair and desk positions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Reliability

If a non-folding supporting construction is used, then the stability of the furniture is improved, but the functionality is reduced as the furniture cannot be stacked or transformed

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovestabilityVSAvoidtransformation capability
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The supporting construction uses folding elements with locking mechanisms that can be dynamically adjusted. When locked, the construction provides stability similar to a non-folding structure; when unlocked, it enables transformation between chair and desk positions, and allows for stacking functionality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The folding supporting construction with locking mechanisms serves multiple functions: it provides stability when locked in position, enables transformation between different furniture configurations, and allows for stacking. This multi-functionality resolves the contradiction between stability and adaptability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Ease of operation

If simple hinge joints are used for transformation, then the ease of operation is improved, but the precision of positioning and structural integrity deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetransformation easeVSAvoidpositioning precision
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

Locking mechanisms act as intermediary elements between the simple hinge joints and the plates. These intermediaries maintain the ease of operation provided by hinge joints while adding precise positioning capability through the locking feature, ensuring structural integrity during and after transformation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Device complexity

If only two folding elements are used in the supporting construction, then the device complexity is reduced, but the reliability of fixing and locking deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconstruction simplicityVSAvoidfixing reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The supporting construction is segmented into at least three folding elements, each capable of being locked independently. This segmentation increases the reliability of fixing and locking compared to a two-element construction, while maintaining relatively simple device complexity through the use of standardized folding and locking mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentEP2061360B1Item of transformable furniture
Publication Date: 2010.12.08 ORT JOINT STOCK CO
  • EP2061360B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP2061360B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP2061360B1 patent drawingFigure 3a~3d

AI summary

The invention relates to an item of transformable furniture, more particularly to an item of furniture transformable from a chair into a desk and vice versa, from a desk into a chair. The item of transformable furniture comprises a first plate (5) and a second plate (6), linked to each other by a hinge joint (4), where said two plates can rotate respectively round first and second horizontal (2, 3) axes so that the plates can be moved from a first position as seat and back, respectively, to a second position as front panel (17) and worktop (18), respectively, and vice versa. Said plates are linked by said first and second horizontal axes to a supporting construction, which consists of at least three interconnected folding elements (1, 1', 19).