Chair-mountable screen

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing chair-mounted screens are ineffective on a wide variety of chairs due to limited size compatibility, instability, and difficulty in maintaining optimal positioning, often requiring elastic straps that can warp the screen.

Innovation Solution

A chair-mountable screen with adjustable X-shaped straps and hook-and-loop fastening material, allowing for secure attachment to different chair sizes and shapes without relying on elastic materials, ensuring stability and preventing tilting.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If elastic straps are used to accommodate different chair sizes, then adaptability is improved, but screen shape stability deteriorates due to warping

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecompatibility with different chair sizesVSAvoidscreen shape stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The strap system is divided into multiple independent straps (first strap, second strap, third strap, fourth strap) arranged in an X-pattern, allowing each strap to independently adjust to chair dimensions without exerting uniform tension that would warp the screen. The segmentation enables distributed force application.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The strap length is made adjustable through fastening mechanisms (such as buckles or velcro) that allow the strap length to be changed according to different chair sizes. This parameter adjustment enables adaptability without using elastic materials that would cause screen deformation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Stability of the object's composition

If additional components are added to prevent tilting, then stability is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvescreen stability against tiltingVSAvoidmounting system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The X-shaped strap arrangement creates asymmetric force distribution that naturally counteracts the top-heaviness of the screen. The diagonal straps provide restoring forces that prevent backward tilting without requiring additional active stabilization components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

Solution Approach 2:

The mounting system transitions from a single-plane horizontal strap to a three-dimensional X-shaped configuration with straps extending in multiple directions. This dimensional change provides stability in both horizontal and vertical planes, preventing tilting without additional components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Device complexity

If a single horizontal strap is used, then device complexity is reduced, but adaptability to irregular chair shapes deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestrap system complexityVSAvoidcompatibility with irregular chair shapes
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The single horizontal strap is segmented into multiple diagonal straps forming an X-pattern. This segmentation allows the mounting system to conform to irregular chair back shapes by distributing attachment points across different locations, accommodating variations in chair geometry.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The strap system evolves from a one-dimensional horizontal strap to a two-dimensional X-shaped configuration. This dimensional expansion provides multiple attachment angles and positions, enabling adaptation to irregular chair shapes while maintaining structural integrity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

4Adaptability or versatility

If the screen is made flatter on top, then adaptability to different chair shapes is improved, but screen surface area is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecompatibility with different chair shapesVSAvoidscreen surface area
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSArea of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The screen frame incorporates a localized flat region at the top portion, while the rest of the screen maintains its full surface area. This local modification improves compatibility with chair shapes without significantly compromising the overall display area, as the flattening is confined to a specific region.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The screen securely mounts on various chair types and sizes, maintaining optimal positioning and stability, preventing tilting and light leakage, while allowing for easy adjustment and use on irregularly shaped chair backs.

Implementation Method 1

hook and loop fastening material between the straps and the screen that can be open and closed

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHook and loop fastening: Velcro

Data Source

PatentUS12082709B2Chair-mountable screen
Publication Date: 2024.09.10 GIG GEAR LLC
  • US12082709B2 patent drawing
  • US12082709B2 patent drawing
  • US12082709B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A chair-mountable screen including a screen frame defining a perimeter of the screen, at least one screen material supported by the screen frame, and a strap arrangement fastened on each of the at least one screen material. The strap arrangement is adjustably-attachable to the screen to create a selectively-sized gap between the screen material and the strap arrangement.