Chair Resistive Support Mechanism With Sensor Feedback

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing chair support mechanisms lack adaptability, provide inadequate resistive support, and fail to promote dynamic movement, leading to prolonged static sitting and inadequate core muscle engagement, while also not being able to measure user activity levels effectively.

Innovation Solution

A resistive motion support mechanism with a pivot ball and resilient member that applies variable resistance, integrated with sensors and a communication system to measure movement and provide feedback, allowing for adjustable resistance and locking features, and the ability to assess user activity levels.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If conventional adjustable chairs with multiple independent adjusting means are used, then individual fit and mobility are improved, but device complexity and difficulty of operation increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveindividual fitVSAvoidmechanism complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines multiple adjustment functions (tilt, rotation, height) into a single integrated resistive support mechanism that responds to user movement rather than requiring separate controls for each degree of freedom. This merging approach maintains adaptability while reducing mechanical complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The mechanism automatically adjusts chair position and resistance based on user movement and weight distribution, eliminating the need for manual adjustment controls. The system self-regulates tilt and rotation angles through resilient members that respond to user activity levels.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Force

If prior art resistive support devices are used, then some resistive support is provided, but the range of motion and variable resistance throughout full range of tilt and rotational motions is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresistive supportVSAvoidrange of motion
Core Design Contradiction:
ForceVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic resistance that varies continuously throughout the full range of motion. The resilient members provide progressive resistance as the chair tilts and rotates, with force increasing as displacement from neutral position increases. This allows variable resistance across the complete range of tilt and rotational motions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The resistive support mechanism simultaneously provides support for multiple degrees of freedom (tilt and rotation) through a unified system of resilient members arranged to resist motion in both planes, rather than requiring separate mechanisms for each motion type.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Stability of the object's composition

If pivot point is positioned significantly below user's centre of mass as in prior art, then structural stability is improved, but core muscle engagement is reduced as user must lean body rather than mobilize pelvic and lower back skeletal structure

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural stabilityVSAvoidcore muscle engagement
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent positions the pivot point at a specific location that optimizes core engagement while maintaining stability. The resilient members are arranged to provide localized resistance at strategic points that target pelvic and lower back muscle groups, creating focused mechanical leverage that promotes core activation without requiring excessive body leaning.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

4Ease of operation

If prior art chairs allow extensive adjustment freedom, then ergonomic positioning is improved, but users end up sitting in fixed position for prolonged periods

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveergonomic positioningVSAvoidstatic sitting duration
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDuration of action of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent incorporates sensors that detect user movement and provide feedback through variable resistance. As users move, the system adjusts resistance levels to encourage continued movement rather than settling into static positions. The resistive force adapts in real-time to user activity, promoting dynamic sitting behavior.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The mechanism creates periodic resistance patterns that naturally encourage rhythmic movement. The resilient members generate oscillating forces as users move between positions, promoting continuous small adjustments and preventing prolonged static sitting through inherent motion-inducing mechanics.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The mechanism enhances user engagement by promoting dynamic movement, improving core strength and reducing static sitting-related issues, while also providing data on user activity levels to encourage more active seating.

Implementation Method 1

a resilient member in contact relation with the pivot ball and with a wall of the housing such that the resilient member is compressed by the relative movement between the resistance cartridge and the pivot ball to thereby provide the resistive support to the mounting surface

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElasticity: Elasticity

Data Source

PatentUS10226127B2Resistive support mechanism for a chair including user feedback
Publication Date: 2019.03.12 CORECHAIR
  • US10226127B2 patent drawing
  • US10226127B2 patent drawing
  • US10226127B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A resistive motion support mechanism joined to a mounting surface and to a base for providing resistive support to the mounting surface as the mounting surface undergoes one or both of rotational and tilt movement relative to the base, the motion support mechanism comprising: a support bearing connected to the mounting surface and to the base which permits one or both of tilting and rotational motion of the mounting surface relative to the base; a resistance cartridge fixedly connected to the mounting surface such that the resistance cartridge undergoes movement relative to the base and applies a resistive force on the base as the mounting surface undergoes the one or both of rotational and tilt movement. The mounting surface and the resistance cartridge are connected by at least one sensor for measuring one of forces applied by the mounting surface on the resistance cartridge, movement of the mounting surface with respect to the cartridge and/or acceleration of the mounting surface with respect to the cartridge.