Chair Support Assembly With Self-Locking Ergonomic Adjustment

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

There is a need for a chair that combines traditional appearance with modern ergonomic benefits and functionality, while being cost-effective, and addresses issues with complex adjustment mechanisms in lumbar, head, or neck supports that can be inadvertently adjusted when leaning.

Innovation Solution

An adjustable support assembly with a mounting member, a support, and a carrier with engagement features, biased by a biasing arrangement that enhances engagement upon rearward force application, and a moulded article with strain-oriented straps for a compliant support surface, allowing for recline mechanisms and adjustable resistance.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If a friction-type adjustment mechanism is used for height adjustment, then the support can be adjusted by applying force, but the support height may inadvertently change when the occupant applies force with an up or down component

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of adjustmentVSAvoidstability of support position
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the friction-type mechanical adjustment mechanism with a spring-biased engagement mechanism. The carrier includes an engagement member that selectively engages with engagement features on the support at discrete positions. A spring biases the engagement member toward the support, and when the occupant applies rearward force, the engagement between the engagement member and engagement features increases, locking the support at the desired height without inadvertent changes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Reliability

If an actuator-release mechanism is used for support adjustment, then the support position can be securely locked, but the adjustment mechanism becomes mechanically complex and expensive

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesecurity of support positionVSAvoidcomplexity of adjustment mechanism
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts the actuator and release mechanism from the adjustment system, eliminating the need for complex mechanical locking components. Instead, the spring-biased engagement member automatically engages with the engagement features on the support, providing secure positioning without requiring user actuation or release mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The adjustment mechanism is designed to be self-regulating. The spring automatically biases the engagement member toward the support, and the increasing engagement force upon rearward application automatically secures the support at the desired position without requiring user intervention for locking or securing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Adaptability or versatility

If a modern mechanistic chair design is used, then ergonomic benefits and adjustability are provided, but the appearance challenges user understanding and may be perceived as high cost

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveergonomic functionalityVSAvoidtraditional appearance
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSShape

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies traditional design aesthetics to specific portions of the chair while incorporating modern ergonomic mechanisms in concealed or integrated ways. The engagement features, carrier, and spring mechanism are designed to be compact and potentially aesthetically pleasing, allowing the chair to maintain traditional appearance characteristics while providing modern ergonomic functionality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution provides a cost-effective chair with enhanced ergonomic support and adjustable features that maintain a traditional appearance, ensuring proper support without complex mechanisms and offering adjustable recline resistance.

Implementation Method 1

the biasing arrangement comprises a biasing member that acts on the engagement member to bias the engagement member toward the support

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElasticity: Elasticity

Implementation Method 2

the first and second biasing members are oppositely oriented torsion springs

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSpring: Spring

Data Source

PatentUS10070727B2Chair and supports
Publication Date: 2018.09.11 FORMWAY FURNITURE
  • US10070727B2 patent drawing
  • US10070727B2 patent drawing
  • US10070727B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An adjustable support assembly for use in a chair has a mounting member 602, a support 605 for supporting part of the body of a chair occupant, and a carrier 611 slidably carrying the support 605. The support has a plurality of engagement features 621 and the carrier has an engagement member 615 that is selectively engageable with the engagement features to enable the support to be selectively positioned relative to the carrier at a plurality of positions. A biasing arrangement 607 operatively connects the carrier 611 to the mounting member 603 and forwardly biases the carrier 611 and support 605. The engagement between the engagement member 615 and an engaged engagement feature 621 increases upon application of rearward force to the support.