Physics-Based Chamber Diagnostics for Real-Time Fault Isolation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional diagnostic methods for manufacturing equipment are inefficient in detecting faults in real-time, leading to unplanned downtime, waste, and increased costs due to delays in identifying and correcting issues in manufacturing processes.

Innovation Solution

A physics-based digital twin model is used to simulate sensor data from manufacturing equipment, allowing for real-time comparison with actual sensor data to identify faulty components and initiate corrective actions, thereby reducing downtime and waste.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If conventional diagnostic methods are used for manufacturing equipment, then device complexity is reduced, but productivity decreases due to delayed fault detection and unplanned downtime

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproduction efficiencyVSAvoiddowntime
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary diagnostic actions by continuously comparing actual sensor data with simulated sensor data from a digital twin model before faults manifest in production. This allows early detection of component degradation and predictive maintenance scheduling, preventing unplanned downtime and maintaining high productivity without requiring complex manual diagnostic procedures

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

A digital twin model (copy) of the manufacturing equipment is created and maintained in real-time. This virtual replica simulates sensor data based on physics-based models and component wear patterns, allowing comparison with actual sensor readings to detect faults before they cause production delays, thereby improving productivity while minimizing downtime

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

2Productivity

If real-time fault detection is implemented using physics-based models, then productivity is improved, but device complexity increases due to the need for trained models and sensor data processing systems

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproduction efficiencyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The physics-based diagnostic system serves multiple functions: it monitors component health, predicts failures, optimizes maintenance schedules, and provides diagnostic recommendations. By consolidating these functions into a single integrated platform that processes sensor data and compares it with digital twin simulations, the system improves productivity through real-time insights while managing complexity through multi-functionality rather than separate specialized systems

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements continuous feedback by comparing actual sensor readings with simulated sensor data from the digital twin model. When deviations are detected, the system automatically generates diagnostic information and maintenance recommendations, creating a closed-loop system that continuously improves production efficiency. The feedback mechanism is managed through automated algorithms that reduce the complexity burden on operators while maintaining high productivity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Measurement precision

If physics-based models are trained to minimize data differences, then measurement precision is improved, but loss of time increases during model training

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefault detection accuracyVSAvoidmodel training time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The physics-based models and digital twin simulations are trained in advance during non-production periods or using historical data, so that when real-time fault detection is needed, the models are already prepared. This preliminary training minimizes measurement precision compromises while avoiding time losses during critical production periods, as the models are ready to immediately compare sensor data and detect faults with high accuracy

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS12147212B2Diagnostic methods for substrate manufacturing chambers using physics-based models
Publication Date: 2024.11.19 APPLIED MATERIALS INC
  • US12147212B2 patent drawing
  • US12147212B2 patent drawing
  • US12147212B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method includes receiving first sensor data, generated during a manufacturing process by sensors associated with a substrate manufacturing chamber. The method further includes receiving simulated sensor data generated by a trained physics-based model. The method further includes determining which one or more components of the manufacturing chamber contribute to a difference between the first sensor data and the simulated sensor data. The method further includes causing performance of a corrective action in view of the difference.