Manufacturing Chamber Sensor Matching for Fast Root Cause Diagnosis

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional manufacturing systems face inefficiencies in diagnosing and correcting sub-optimal performance issues in equipment due to cumbersome analysis of large amounts of sensor data, leading to wasted time, energy, and materials, as well as unscheduled downtime and additional costs.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of a method that generates summary data using statistical and machine learning methods to analyze trace sensor data, allowing for quick processing and reduced communication bandwidth, and utilizes a digital twin model to identify root causes and trigger corrective actions efficiently.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If conventional manufacturing systems analyze large amounts of sensor data to diagnose equipment performance issues, then diagnostic accuracy is improved, but analysis time and computational resources are excessively consumed

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvediagnostic accuracyVSAvoidanalysis time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts and separates critical diagnostic features from the complete sensor data stream using unsupervised machine learning models. By identifying and isolating the most relevant features that indicate equipment performance deviations, the system achieves accurate diagnostics without processing the entire large-volume sensor dataset, thereby reducing analysis time while maintaining diagnostic precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates simplified representations (copies) of the complex sensor data through unsupervised learning models that capture essential patterns and anomalies. These model-generated representations serve as substitutes for analyzing the full raw data, enabling rapid diagnostic assessment while preserving the critical information needed for accurate equipment performance evaluation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

2Loss of information

If conventional systems process complete sensor data traces to identify root causes, then diagnostic completeness is improved, but computational energy and resources are wasted

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvediagnostic completenessVSAvoidcomputational energy
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system extracts only the essential diagnostic information needed for root cause identification by using unsupervised learning models to isolate critical features from the sensor data. This selective extraction maintains diagnostic completeness by focusing on the most informative aspects of the data while discarding redundant information, thereby significantly reducing computational energy requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies partial action by processing only the necessary portion of sensor data required for effective root cause identification. Rather than analyzing complete data traces, the unsupervised learning models process selected features and patterns that are sufficient for accurate diagnostics, avoiding the excessive computational energy consumption associated with full data processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Manufacturing precision

If manufacturers perform detailed analysis of sensor data to prevent sub-optimal product production, then product quality is improved, but production time is lost due to extensive monitoring

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproduct qualityVSAvoidproduction speed
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses unsupervised learning models to create simplified copies or representations of sensor data that capture quality-critical patterns. These model-generated summaries enable rapid quality assessment without requiring detailed analysis of complete sensor traces, thereby maintaining high manufacturing precision while minimizing the time lost to monitoring activities and preserving production speed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

4Device complexity

If conventional systems use traditional statistical methods for data analysis, then method simplicity is maintained, but analysis efficiency and speed are insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemethod simplicityVSAvoidanalysis speed
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSSpeed

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transitions from traditional statistical methods to unsupervised machine learning approaches, representing a parameter change in the analytical methodology. This change enables significantly faster analysis speeds by leveraging algorithms optimized for pattern recognition and feature extraction in high-dimensional sensor data, while the automated nature of these models maintains relative simplicity in implementation and operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS12189380B2Diagnostic tool to tool matching and comparative drill-down analysis methods for manufacturing equipment
Publication Date: 2025.01.07 APPLIED MATERIALS INC
  • US12189380B2 patent drawing
  • US12189380B2 patent drawing
  • US12189380B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method includes receiving first data associated with measurements taken by a sensor during a first manufacturing procedure of a manufacturing chamber. The method further includes receiving second data. The second data includes reference data associated with the first data. The method further includes providing the first and second data to a comparison model. The method further includes receiving a similarity score from the comparison model, associated with the first and second data. The method further includes performance of a corrective action in view of the similarity score.