Channel Context Copyright Detection via Feature Extraction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for detecting video copyright misuse are inefficient, relying heavily on manual policing or requiring access to original content for watermarking and fingerprinting, which are not scalable or reliable, especially for short videos and large datasets.

Innovation Solution

A method using a feature-based classifier trained on channel features and historical piracy data to predict the likelihood of copyright violations without analyzing the video or audio content, employing machine learning models to identify potential piracy sources based on metadata and user engagement metrics.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If video fingerprinting techniques are used to detect copyright violations, then detection accuracy is improved, but storage requirements and processing intensity increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection accuracyVSAvoidstorage requirements
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts only the essential channel features (metadata, user engagement metrics, video properties) from the complete video content, storing and analyzing only these extracted features rather than the entire video database. This reduces storage requirements while maintaining detection capability through the trained classifier model.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary extraction and storage of channel features and historical piracy data before actual detection occurs. The classifier is pre-trained on this extracted data, enabling rapid detection without needing to re-process original video content during detection operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Reliability

If manual policing methods are used to identify copyright violations, then detection reliability is improved, but productivity and scalability deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection reliabilityVSAvoidscalability
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements self-service through automated machine learning classifiers that independently analyze channel features and predict copyright violation likelihood without human intervention. The trained models automatically process new channels, providing scalable detection while maintaining consistent reliability through the learned patterns from historical data.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces manual mechanical review processes with automated computational classifiers. The machine learning models substitute human analysts, processing channels at machine speed while maintaining detection reliability through training on historical piracy patterns.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Measurement precision

If watermarking techniques are used for copyright detection, then detection accuracy is improved, but device complexity and operational requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection accuracyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of embedding watermarks in original content and searching for them (traditional approach), the patent inverts the approach by analyzing channel features and behavior patterns to predict piracy likelihood. This eliminates the need for watermarking infrastructure while achieving detection through alternative mathematical modeling.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

4Measurement precision

If complete video content analysis is performed to detect piracy, then measurement precision is improved, but processing time and computational energy increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection precisionVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system extracts only relevant features from complete video content (metadata, channel statistics, engagement metrics) rather than analyzing entire video files. This extraction enables precise detection predictions without the computational burden of processing full video content.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies partial action by analyzing only the most discriminative channel features necessary for piracy detection rather than performing exhaustive analysis of all video properties. The trained classifier identifies and uses only the features that most strongly correlate with piracy behavior.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS11526586B2Copyright detection in videos based on channel context
Publication Date: 2022.12.13 RHEI CREATIONS CORP
  • US11526586B2 patent drawing
  • US11526586B2 patent drawing
  • US11526586B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The herein disclosed technology provides methods and systems that utilize machine learning solutions to identify web-based channels that are sources pirated copyright material, such as by using a machine learning classifier that is trained on historical copyright piracy data and channel features that may be determined and analyzed for each of a collection of channels without analyzing video or audio content of the channel.