Channel Control Circuit for Semiconductor Test Efficiency

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current semiconductor devices face limitations in test efficiency, particularly in the direct access mode, where it is impossible to perform boundary tests on individual channels, control electrical fuses of each channel, or measure current by channel, due to the need for common signal application across all channels.

Innovation Solution

A channel control circuit that generates specific control signals to selectively activate and deactivate channels, allowing for independent operation of one channel while maintaining a structural connection for simultaneous testing across multiple channels, enabling various tests to be performed on each channel.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If direct access mode is used to test all channels simultaneously, then testing coverage is improved, but individual channel control capability deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetesting coverageVSAvoidindividual channel control
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the control of multiple channels into independent controllable units. Each channel can be individually activated or deactivated through separate control signals while maintaining the ability to test all channels simultaneously. This segmentation allows granular control over each channel's test state without compromising overall testing coverage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements dynamic channel activation and deactivation capabilities. The control circuit can change the operational state of each channel in real-time during testing, allowing the system to transition between testing individual channels and testing all channels simultaneously based on test requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Device complexity

If common signal application is used for all channels, then structural simplicity is maintained, but boundary test capability deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural simplicityVSAvoidboundary test capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The control circuit segments the common signal application into channel-specific control paths. While a common signal structure is maintained, separate control signals are generated for each channel based on the test mode, enabling boundary tests for individual channels without significantly increasing structural complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The control circuit acts as an intermediary between the common signal application and individual channel requirements. It receives common test signals and translates them into channel-specific control signals, enabling boundary testing while maintaining the simplicity of common signal application architecture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Productivity

If all channels are tested simultaneously, then test time is reduced, but individual channel measurement capability deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetest timeVSAvoidindividual channel measurement
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent enables dynamic switching between parallel testing of all channels and sequential testing of individual channels. The control circuit can activate specific channels for detailed measurement while deactivating others, allowing individual channel current measurement and other precise measurements without permanently sacrificing the ability to test all channels simultaneously.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The control circuit implements periodic activation and deactivation of channels during the test sequence. Channels are activated in specific periods for individual measurement, then deactivated and reactivated for parallel testing, creating a periodic pattern that accommodates both individual measurement and overall productivity requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

4Ease of operation

If direct access mode is used, then ease of testing is improved, but electrical fuse control capability deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of testingVSAvoidelectrical fuse control
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The control circuit segments the electrical fuse control into channel-specific control paths. Each channel has its own control signal that can independently activate or deactivate the electrical fuse for that channel, enabling selective current path control while maintaining the ease of testing through the same control mechanism.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS9470757B2Channel control circuit and semiconductor device having the same
Publication Date: 2016.10.18 SK HYNIX INC
  • US9470757B2 patent drawing
  • US9470757B2 patent drawing
  • US9470757B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A channel control circuit having a plurality of channels according to an embodiment of the present invention includes: a channel control signal generating block configured to generate a channel control signal capable of selectively controlling an activated state of a channel in response to a combination of a first test mode signal and a second test mode signal; a scan buffer control signal generating block configured to generate a scan buffer control signal in response to the first test mode signal and a scan signal; a clock buffer control signal generating block configured to generate a clock buffer control signal in response to the channel control signal and the scan buffer control signal; and a clock input buffer configured to generate a clock output signal, which is used as an internal clock of a semiconductor device, in response to the clock buffer control signal.