Channel Response Averaging for Lower-Complexity Equalization

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Bandwidth constrained communication systems face high complexity and power dissipation due to extended channel responses, leading to increased latency and challenging implementation in equalization structures, with existing solutions failing to meet industry needs for reduced complexity and low power dissipation.

Innovation Solution

A method involving full-length channel response acquisition, reduction of channel responses through weighted averaging based on symbol patterns, and using the resulting reduced set as a model for lower complexity equalization, which can be repeated in time-varying channels, effectively shortening the effective channel response length.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If full-length channel response equalization is used to mitigate intersymbol interference, then system performance is improved, but equalizer complexity increases exponentially

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem performanceVSAvoidequalizer complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the channel response into multiple subsets based on symbol pattern groups. Instead of processing the full channel response directly, the equalizer divides it into manageable segments corresponding to different symbol pattern categories, thereby reducing the computational complexity while maintaining equalization performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the parameter representation by using averaged channel responses for each symbol pattern group rather than full-length individual responses. This parameter transformation reduces the effective length of channel responses that need to be processed, exponentially reducing equalizer complexity from O(2^L) to O(2^M) where M < L.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Measurement precision

If extended channel response processing is implemented to reduce intersymbol interference, then equalization accuracy is improved, but power dissipation increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveequalization accuracyVSAvoidpower dissipation
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the channel response processing into grouped symbol patterns, reducing the number of computations required for equalization. This segmentation directly reduces the power dissipation by decreasing the number of multiplications and additions performed in the equalizer while maintaining equalization accuracy through preserved essential channel characteristics.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Reliability

If high complexity equalization structures are used to handle channel impairments, then mitigation performance is improved, but latency increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemitigation performanceVSAvoidlatency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the effective parameter length of channel responses by using averaged responses for symbol pattern groups. This parameter reduction decreases the processing depth required in the equalizer, thereby reducing latency while maintaining mitigation performance through preserved essential channel response characteristics.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Use of energy by moving object

If reduced complexity equalization structures are used to lower power dissipation, then power efficiency is improved, but equalization performance deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepower efficiencyVSAvoidequalization performance
Core Design Contradiction:
Use of energy by moving objectVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transforms the channel response parameters by averaging responses within symbol pattern groups, creating compact representations that retain essential equalization information. This parameter transformation enables reduced complexity equalization structures to achieve acceptable power dissipation while maintaining adequate equalization performance through preserved dominant channel characteristics.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS9154346B2Method for reducing equalizer complexity in communication links
Publication Date: 2015.10.06 SANS R&D LLC
  • US9154346B2 patent drawing
  • US9154346B2 patent drawing
  • US9154346B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The present invention relates to a method of reducing equalizer complexity in communication systems, which also provides for reduced power dissipation. The method consists of reducing the number of channel responses expected by the equalizer by averaging sub-groups of all of the possible the channel responses chosen in a particular way.