Chaos Controller Injecting Failures Across Microservice Stacks

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current chaos engineering tools primarily focus on domain-specific failures, impacting end-users and lacking comprehensive observability across complex networks with multiple administrative domains, making it difficult to validate security and policy compliance effectively.

Innovation Solution

A system and method that utilize a chaos controller to generate and execute chaos hypotheses across a technology stack, communicating with full-stack observability agents to inject failures and collect metrics, ensuring minimal impact on end-users and providing dynamic compliance validation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If domain-specific chaos engineering tools are used to inject failures, then failure injection capability is improved, but comprehensive observability across complex networks with multiple administrative domains deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefailure injection capabilityVSAvoidnetwork complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a universal chaos engineering platform that can inject failures across multiple domains (network, host, application, database) and collect observability data from various administrative domains through a single integrated system. The controller can selectively target different layers and domains while maintaining a unified observability perspective, resolving the contradiction between specialized failure injection and comprehensive observability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary observability collection mechanism that aggregates data from multiple administrative domains and failure injection points into a centralized view. This intermediary layer synthesizes complex multi-domain data into actionable metrics, enabling comprehensive observability without requiring direct management of each individual domain's complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Measurement precision

If comprehensive observability is implemented across the entire stack, then measurement capability is improved, but system complexity and difficulty of operation worsen

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveobservability coverageVSAvoidoperational simplicity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the observability system into modular components: domain-specific chaos engineering tools for failure injection, distributed observability agents for data collection, and a centralized controller for coordination. This segmentation allows each component to operate independently with well-defined interfaces, maintaining comprehensive measurement coverage while simplifying operational complexity through modularity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements feedback mechanisms where the controller receives observability data from distributed agents, analyzes the impact of injected failures, and adjusts subsequent failure injection strategies. This closed-loop feedback automates operational decisions, reducing manual intervention complexity while maintaining comprehensive observability across the entire stack.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Reliability

If chaos engineering failures are injected to validate security policies, then compliance validation capability is improved, but user impact and system disruption worsen

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecompliance validation capabilityVSAvoiduser impact
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by enabling selective failure injection at specific domains and layers based on the compliance validation requirements. Instead of injecting failures system-wide, the controller targets specific administrative domains or service layers where policy validation is needed, minimizing overall user impact while maintaining comprehensive compliance validation capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements preliminary action by allowing compliance validation failures to be injected during off-peak hours or in controlled test environments before affecting production traffic. The system can pre-validate security policies using synthetic failures that do not impact actual users, reserving real user impact scenarios for authorized testing windows only.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS20240427918A1Systems and methods for injecting failures across a stack
Publication Date: 2024.12.26 CISCO TECHNOLOGY INC
  • US20240427918A1 patent drawing
  • US20240427918A1 patent drawing
  • US20240427918A1 patent drawing

AI summary

In one embodiment, a method includes generating a security policy and converting the security policy into a chaos hypothesis. The method also includes initiating execution of the chaos hypothesis across a plurality of microservices within a technology stack. The method further includes receiving metrics associated with the execution of the chaos hypothesis across the plurality of microservices within the technology stack.