Chaotic Mapping for Structured Musical Mash-ups

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for creating mash-ups of musical compositions often result in unstructured variations, lacking a discernible structure that would allow them to be perceived as standalone songs, and do not effectively utilize the by-products of the song production process for additional revenue streams.

Innovation Solution

The method involves parsing and beat-matching musical inputs to align their elements, applying improved chaotic mapping to substitute and modify components, and using mash-up algorithms like MUiMUv and muMap to create structured mash-ups that combine elements from multiple songs, while also generating separate instrumental and vocal tracks for superposition, ensuring a cohesive and structured output.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If chaotic mapping is applied to generate musical variations, then creativity and variety are improved, but structural coherence deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovecreativityVSAvoidstructural coherence
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies different processing qualities to different parts of the musical composition. Chaotic mapping is applied selectively to specific segments or elements (such as melody lines or rhythmic patterns) rather than uniformly across the entire composition. This allows certain portions to exhibit high creativity and variation while other portions maintain structural stability and coherence, resolving the contradiction between creativity and structural coherence.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts the degree of chaotic transformation applied at different points in the composition. By varying the intensity and application of chaotic mapping throughout the piece, the system creates a balance where some sections display high creativity through substantial variation while other sections maintain structural integrity through more conservative transformations, thereby resolving the contradiction between creativity and structural coherence.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Adaptability or versatility

If mash-up algorithms combine elements from multiple songs, then versatility and creative output are improved, but complexity of production increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveversatilityVSAvoidcomplexity of production
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The mash-up process is segmented into distinct automated stages: parsing individual songs into structural elements, beat-matching to synchronize tempos, applying chaotic mapping to generate variations, and algorithmic recombination of elements. This segmentation transforms a complex manual production process into manageable automated steps, reducing overall production complexity while maintaining high versatility in combining multiple songs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system employs self-service mechanisms where the mash-up algorithm automatically performs beat-matching, tempo synchronization, and element recombination without requiring manual intervention. The chaotic mapping process also operates autonomously to generate appropriate variations. This automation significantly reduces production complexity while enabling versatile combination of multiple songs through intelligent self-adjusting processes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Loss of energy

If by-products of song production are utilized for mash-ups, then resource efficiency is improved, but quality control becomes more difficult

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresource efficiencyVSAvoidquality control
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The chaotic mapping process serves as an intermediary transformation stage that processes raw by-product materials (unused vocal tracks, instrumental layers, or alternate takes) into refined musical elements suitable for mash-up integration. This intermediary processing step automatically adjusts timing, pitch, and texture to match the target composition, thereby maintaining quality control while efficiently utilizing previously discarded resources.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system automatically adjusts multiple parameters (tempo, pitch, timing, volume) of the by-product materials during the chaotic mapping and beat-matching processes. These parameter changes transform the raw by-products into quality-controlled elements that seamlessly integrate with the final mash-up composition, resolving the contradiction between resource efficiency and quality control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS10614785B1Method and apparatus for computer-aided mash-up variations of music and other sequences, including mash-up variation by chaotic mapping
Publication Date: 2020.04.07 DABBY DIANA
  • US10614785B1 patent drawing
  • US10614785B1 patent drawing
  • US10614785B1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for creating mash-ups of musical and/or other inputs includes parsing each input into a sequence of elements, which can be of equal length, beat-matching the inputs to make corresponding elements of equal beat length, and combining the elements to form a mash-up. Embodiments align the inputs before combination. The inputs can each include a plurality of tracks. Improved chaotic mapping can be used to substitute elements between tracks of the inputs. The elements, singly or in groups, can be modified before substitution. In other embodiments elements from the input tracks are introduced into a mash-up template whereby different combinations of corresponding elements are included in each mash-up frame. The tracks can be successively introduced into the mash-up and/or successively eliminated in a final Coda section of the mash-up. The combinations can be according to a recognizable pattern, which can be repeated, or determined by improved chaotic mapping.