Chaotic Neural Desynchronization via Optimal Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current deep brain stimulation (DBS) techniques for mitigating Parkinson's disease tremors are inefficient in terms of energy consumption and can cause tissue damage, with existing methods requiring high-frequency, pulsatile signals that are not adaptable and do not effectively desynchronize neurons.

Innovation Solution

The use of chaotic desynchronization of neural populations through optimal control theory to calculate stimuli that minimize energy usage and maximize the Lyapunov exponent, allowing for adaptive and efficient desynchronization of neurons with reduced power consumption and tissue impact.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If high-frequency pulsatile signals are used for deep brain stimulation, then tremors are mitigated through desynchronization of neurons, but energy consumption increases and tissue damage occurs

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetremor mitigation efficacyVSAvoidenergy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs periodic pulsed stimulation instead of continuous high-frequency signals. The stimulation is delivered in discrete pulses at lower frequencies, achieving neural desynchronization through timed intermittent activation rather than sustained high-frequency driving, thereby reducing overall energy consumption while maintaining therapeutic effect

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

The stimulation parameters are made dynamic and adaptive rather than fixed. The system adjusts pulse timing, amplitude, and frequency based on real-time monitoring of neural activity and patient response, optimizing energy efficiency by delivering stimulation only when and where needed to maintain desynchronization

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Reliability

If permanent high-frequency pulsatile signals are administered, then neural desynchronization is achieved, but battery life is reduced and side effects increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveneural desynchronizationVSAvoidbattery life
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDuration of action of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses intermittent periodic stimulation rather than continuous operation. By delivering pulses only during periods when desynchronization is needed and allowing rest periods, the overall power consumption is dramatically reduced, extending battery life while maintaining therapeutic efficacy through strategically timed stimulation episodes

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

The system recovers and utilizes natural neural oscillation patterns and endogenous rhythms rather than constantly imposing external high-frequency signals. By leveraging the brain's own rhythmic activity and only providing minimal corrective stimulation when synchronization occurs, energy is conserved and battery life is extended

Inventive Principle:
Principle #34Discarding and recovering

3Reliability

If high-frequency pulsatile stimulation is used, then tremor symptoms are controlled, but neuronal adaptation increases reducing long-term efficacy

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetremor controlVSAvoidneuronal adaptation resistance
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The stimulation protocol dynamically adapts its parameters based on neuronal response and adaptation markers. By continuously monitoring neural activity patterns and adjusting pulse timing and amplitude in real-time, the system prevents neurons from adapting to a fixed pattern, maintaining long-term efficacy through variable, responsive stimulation that evolves with neural plasticity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system incorporates feedback mechanisms that monitor neural response and adjust stimulation parameters accordingly. By detecting signs of neuronal adaptation or resynchronization and modifying the stimulation pattern in response, the system maintains effective tremor control over extended periods by preventing the development of adaptive tolerance

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS9352155B2Chaotic desynchronization of neural populations with non-pulsatile inputs
Publication Date: 2016.05.31 UNIV OF MINNESOTA
  • US9352155B2 patent drawing
  • US9352155B2 patent drawing
  • US9352155B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method is provided for finding an energy-optimal stimulus which gives a positive Lyapunov exponent, and hence desynchronization, for a neural population. The method is illustrated for three different neural models. Not only does it achieve desynchronization for each model, but it also does so using less energy than recently proposed methods, suggesting a powerful alternative to pulsatile stimuli for deep brain stimulation. Furthermore, we calculate error bounds on the optimal stimulus which will guarantee a minimum Lyapunov exponent. Also, a related control strategy is developed for desynchronizing neurons based on the population's phase distribution.