Carbon-Alkali Metal Char Catalyst Sulfur Tolerance

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methanation catalysts for converting carbon monoxide and hydrogen to methane are sensitive to sulfur compounds, requiring expensive and time-consuming purification and regeneration processes, and existing carbon-alkali metal catalysts consume valuable carbon and alkali materials.

Innovation Solution

A carbon-alkali metal methanation catalyst comprising a carbon char with specific properties, such as a molar ratio of alkali metal to carbon (AIM/C) between 0.1 and 0.6, BET surface area of 10 to 400 m2/g, and average particle size of 25 μm to 2500 μm, which can be used directly as a sulfur-tolerant catalyst without the need for sulfur removal pretreatment.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conventional methanation catalysts (iron, nickel, or cobalt compounds) are used, then methanation activity is achieved, but the catalyst is quickly poisoned by sulfur compounds requiring expensive purification and regeneration

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecatalyst resistance to sulfur poisoningVSAvoidcost and complexity of gas purification process
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The invention changes the chemical composition parameters of the catalyst by using carbon-alkali metal compounds instead of conventional iron, nickel, or cobalt compounds. This compositional parameter change fundamentally alters the catalyst's interaction with sulfur compounds, providing resistance to sulfur poisoning while maintaining methanation activity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The invention employs composite materials by combining carbon with alkali metals (such as potassium, sodium, or lithium) to create a new catalyst system. This composite structure provides both the structural stability of carbon and the catalytic properties enhanced by alkali metals, resulting in sulfur-resistant catalyst performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Reliability

If carbon-alkali metal catalysts are used to achieve sulfur tolerance, then resistance to sulfur poisoning is improved, but valuable carbon and alkali materials are consumed

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecatalyst resistance to sulfur poisoningVSAvoidconsumption of carbon and alkali materials
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The invention applies local quality by concentrating alkali metals on the surface or specific sites of carbon particles rather than requiring bulk carbon-alkali metal compounds. This localized distribution allows the carbon support to remain stable and reusable while only the surface alkali metal sites participate in catalysis, reducing overall material consumption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Productivity

If traditional methanation catalysts are used, then catalytic activity is maintained, but periodic regeneration is required which is time-consuming and expensive

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontinuous operation time without regenerationVSAvoidtime for catalyst regeneration
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The invention adopts a disposable catalyst approach where the carbon-alkali metal catalyst is designed to be used until deactivation and then replaced rather than regenerated. The carbon support provides structural stability allowing the catalyst to maintain activity for extended periods, and the low cost of carbon and alkali metals makes replacement more economical than regeneration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The carbon-alkali metal char catalyst effectively produces a methane-enriched gas while being resistant to sulfur poisoning, reducing the need for costly sulfur removal steps and allowing for the reuse of char byproducts, thus enhancing the efficiency and cost-effectiveness of the methanation process.

Implementation Method 1

The reaction of carbon monoxide and hydrogen to produce methane has been carried out in the presence of a catalyst such as various iron, nickel or cobalt compounds

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCatalysis: Catalysis

Data Source

PatentUS8502007B2Char methanation catalyst and its use in gasification processes
Publication Date: 2013.08.06 SURE CHAMPION INVESTMENT LTD
  • US8502007B2 patent drawing
  • US8502007B2 patent drawing
  • US8502007B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The invention provides processes for generating a methane-enriched gas from a gas mixture comprising carbon monoxide and hydrogen such as gas streams generated by gasification of an alkali metal catalyst-loaded carbonaceous feedstock, and a char methanation catalyst useful in such processes.