Characterized Memory Validation for Cryptocurrency Mining

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current memory hard cryptocurrency mining relies on general compute memories, which are expensive and inefficient, and using less reliable memories can result in excessive invalid proof-of-work (POW) solutions, leading to penalties and resource wastage.

Innovation Solution

The use of characterized memories with error-tolerant techniques to validate and optimize memory searches, allowing for faster and more efficient mining by selecting characterized rates based on solution density functions and bit error rates, and employing validation stages to ensure accurate results.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If general compute memories are used for memory hard cryptocurrency mining, then mining can be performed, but the cost is high and efficiency is poor

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemining efficiencyVSAvoidcost
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies this principle by using characterized memories (second-class or defective memory devices) instead of expensive general compute memories. These cheaper memories are subjected to a validation stage that filters out invalid results, allowing the system to achieve cost-effective mining operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

Solution Approach 2:

The validation stage acts as an intermediary component between the characterized memory search process and the final POW solution acceptance. This intermediary validates the results from the less reliable characterized memories, ensuring only valid solutions are accepted while allowing the use of cheaper memory devices.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Ease of manufacture

If less reliable memories are used to reduce cost, then mining cost decreases, but excessive invalid POW solutions are generated leading to penalties

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovecostVSAvoidPOW solution validity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The validation stage serves as a mediator that receives results from characterized memories and filters out invalid POW solutions before they are submitted to the network. This intermediary ensures that only valid solutions from the less reliable characterized memories are accepted, preventing penalties while maintaining cost advantages.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The validation stage provides feedback by checking the validity of POW solutions generated by characterized memories and only accepting valid results. This feedback mechanism allows the system to use cheaper, less reliable memories while maintaining the reliability required for network acceptance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Productivity

If faster memory search rates are used to increase productivity, then mining speed increases, but bit error rates increase leading to more invalid solutions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvememory search speedVSAvoidbit error rate
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The validation stage functions as an intermediary that allows the system to operate at higher memory search rates using characterized memories while filtering out the invalid results caused by increased bit error rates. This enables faster mining operations without accepting the harmful effects of higher error rates.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses characterized memories that can operate at higher speeds with higher error rates, accepting that these cheaper devices will generate some invalid results. The validation stage then filters these out, allowing the system to achieve faster overall productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

Data Source

PatentUS11847183B2Methods and apparatus for checking the results of characterized memory searches
Publication Date: 2023.12.19 MICRON TECHNOLOGY INC
  • US11847183B2 patent drawing
  • US11847183B2 patent drawing
  • US11847183B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods and apparatus for using characterized devices such as memories. In one embodiment, characterized memories are associated with a range of performances over a range of operational parameters. The characterized memories can be used in conjunction with a solution density function to optimize memory searching. In one exemplary embodiment, a cryptocurrency miner can utilize characterized memories to generate memory hard proof-of-work (POW). The results may be further validated against general compute memories; such that only valid solutions are broadcasted to the mining community. In one embodiment, the validation mechanism is implemented for a plurality of searching apparatus in parallel to provide a more distributed and efficient approach. Various other applications for characterized memories are also described in greater detail herein (e.g., blockchain, social media, machine learning, probabilistic applications and other error-tolerant applications).