Charge Compensation via Ionized Gas in Particle-Optical Imaging

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Particle-optical imaging of non-conductive samples often results in unwanted electrical charging, leading to image distortions and reduced contrast due to electrostatic charging artifacts, which existing methods struggle to effectively prevent or compensate for.

Innovation Solution

The method involves ionizing gas molecules near the sample surface using a primary particle beam or secondary electrons to generate charged gas particles that neutralize the charge, employing techniques such as pulse-shaped gas introduction or high-field ionization with a focused laser beam to minimize interference with image generation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Object-affected harmful factors

If a coating of conductive materials is applied to the sample surface, then electrical charging is prevented, but sample preparation time and complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveelectrical chargingVSAvoidsample preparation
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

A gas (such as nitrogen or noble gas) is introduced as an intermediary medium between the electron beam and the non-conductive sample surface. The gas becomes ionized by the electron beam, creating charged particles that neutralize the charge accumulation on the sample surface without requiring direct contact or coating of the sample

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The physical state of the charging compensation mechanism is changed from a static solid coating to a dynamic gaseous environment. By controlling gas pressure, flow rate, and composition, the charging compensation can be adjusted in real-time during imaging without altering the sample itself

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Object-affected harmful factors

If low vacuum operation is used, then charging is reduced, but specialized equipment and vacuum systems are required

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveelectrical chargingVSAvoidvacuum system
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The vacuum level is made dynamic rather than static. The system operates at variable vacuum levels, introducing gas only when and where needed for charging compensation, while maintaining overall vacuum conditions suitable for electron beam operation. This allows standard vacuum systems to be used with enhanced functionality

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Object-affected harmful factors

If gas is introduced in direct vicinity of sample, then charging compensation is effective, but secondary electrons interact with charged gas particles reducing image quality

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveelectrical chargingVSAvoidimage quality
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

Gas introduction is implemented as a periodic or pulsed process rather than continuous. Gas is introduced in synchronized cycles with the electron beam scanning, providing charging compensation during beam dwell periods while minimizing gas presence during secondary electron collection phases

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

Gas introduction is localized to specific regions or timing rather than being uniform across the entire sample area. The gas flow is directed preferentially toward areas experiencing charging, and the timing is optimized to provide compensation where needed while minimizing interference with secondary electron detection in other regions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach effectively reduces or neutralizes unwanted charging, improving image quality by preventing charging artifacts and allowing for high-quality image acquisition without the need for sample preparation or specialized vacuum systems.

Implementation Method 1

ionizing gas molecules near the sample surface using a primary particle beam or secondary electrons to generate charged gas particles

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectIonization: Ionisation

Implementation Method 2

interaction products such as e.g. secondary electrons are released as a result of the interaction between the particles of the primary particle beam and the sample

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectImpact ionization: Ionisation

Implementation Method 3

Molecules of the residual gas are ionized by high-field ionization via a focused laser beam

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPhotoionization: Photoionisation

Data Source

PatentUS10115558B2Methods and devices for charge compensation
Publication Date: 2018.10.30 CARL ZEISS MICROSCOPY GMBH
  • US10115558B2 patent drawing
  • US10115558B2 patent drawing
  • US10115558B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods are provided for operating a particle-optical device, wherein electrical charging of a sample to be examined is reduced. The particle-optical device includes a vacuum chamber for receiving a sample, a particle source for generating a primary particle beam directed to the sample, a scan generator for directed guidance of the primary particle beam over the sample surface, and at least one detector for detecting interaction products created during the interaction between the primary particle beam and the sample.