Quarter-Rate Charge-Steering DFE Taps for Lower-Power Clocking

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current decision feedback equalizers (DFEs) face challenges in high-speed data transmission due to inter-symbol interference (ISI) and power consumption issues, especially with charge-steering (CS) equalizers requiring extensive clock distribution, which complicates design for increased data rates.

Innovation Solution

The development of simplified clock routing and lower power consumption charge-steering taps for DFEs, utilizing a differential pair of p-channel input transistors and variable capacitors to adjust input bits based on previous output bits, allowing for efficient data processing at higher speeds.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of energy

If charge-steering equalizers are used to reduce power consumption, then power savings are achieved, but extensive clock distribution is required which complicates design for high-speed transmission

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepower consumptionVSAvoidclock distribution complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The DFE is divided into multiple independent taps, each operating at quarter-rate. This segmentation allows each tap to use simplified clocking without requiring extensive high-speed clock distribution across the entire equalizer, thus reducing overall clock distribution complexity while maintaining power savings

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Multiple identical quarter-rate taps are used instead of a single complex half-rate tap. Each tap is a simplified copy that operates independently at lower speed, eliminating the need for complex clock distribution while achieving the required equalization function through parallel processing

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

2Productivity

If data transmission speeds are increased, then productivity is improved, but inter-symbol interference and power consumption are exacerbated

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata transmission speedVSAvoidpower consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The equalizer uses periodic quarter-rate sampling and processing instead of continuous high-speed operation. By processing data at quarter-rate intervals with multiple taps, the system achieves high effective data transmission speed while reducing instantaneous power consumption and ISI through better signal conditioning at each sampling point

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

3Productivity

If data transmission speeds are increased, then productivity is improved, but clock distribution complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata transmission speedVSAvoidclock distribution complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the high-speed data stream into multiple quarter-rate processing channels. Each channel operates independently with simplified clocking requirements, allowing high overall data transmission speed without the need for complex high-speed clock distribution networks

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Multiple quarter-rate tap circuits are used as simplified copies instead of a single complex high-speed circuit. This copying approach enables high effective data rate through parallel processing while each copy uses simple clocking, eliminating the need for complex clock distribution

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Data Source

PatentUS10536303B1Quarter-rate charge-steering decision feedback equalizer (DFE) taps
Publication Date: 2020.01.14 CIENA CORP
  • US10536303B1 patent drawing
  • US10536303B1 patent drawing
  • US10536303B1 patent drawing

AI summary

A decision feedback equalizer (DFE) comprises two charge-steering (CS) input latches driven by complementary ½-rate clocks, two pairs of CS primary latches, and two pairs of taps. The primary latches are driven by ¼-rate clocks. In a first aspect, each one of the input latches and the primary latches includes a respective differential pair of n-channel output transistors, and each tap includes a respective differential pair of p-channel input transistors. In a second aspect, each one of the input latches and the primary latches includes a respective differential pair of p-channel input transistors, and each tap includes a respective differential pair of n-channel output transistors. In some implementations, no element of any one of the taps is driven by any ½-rate clock. In some implementations, every switch of at least one of the taps is driven by one of the ¼-rate clocks.