Charge-Trapping Material Additives for Flash Memory Retention

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Charge-trapping-material in memory cells often has too many shallow traps, leading to poor charge retention, which is a challenge in improving the data storage capabilities of flash memory devices.

Innovation Solution

Incorporating trap-enhancing-additives such as carbon, boron, phosphorus, or metal into the charge-trapping-material, like silicon nitride, to modify the trap depth and increase trap density while maintaining desired retention properties, thereby enhancing charge retention.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conventional charge-trapping-material is used in memory cells, then the device structure is simple and manufacturing is easier, but the charge retention is poor due to too many shallow traps

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecharge retentionVSAvoidmaterial composition complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies composite materials by combining silicon nitride with trap-enhancing additives (carbon, boron, phosphorus, or metal) to create a composite charge-trapping-material. This composite structure provides both the structural foundation of silicon nitride and the trap-depth modification of the additives, resolving the contradiction between simple structure and improved charge retention.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the chemical composition parameters of the charge-trapping-material by incorporating specific concentrations of trap-enhancing additives (e.g., carbon at 0.2-20 atomic percent, boron at 0.2-20 atomic percent). This parameter modification transforms the trap depth distribution from predominantly shallow to including deeper traps, thereby improving charge retention while maintaining manufacturing feasibility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If trap-enhancing-additives are incorporated into charge-trapping-material, then deeper traps are created and charge retention improves, but the manufacturing process becomes more complex

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecharge retentionVSAvoidmanufacturing process simplicity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges the deposition of trap-enhancing-additives with the existing silicon nitride formation process. By combining these steps into a single integrated manufacturing process, the patent achieves improved charge retention through additive incorporation while minimizing the increase in manufacturing complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent modifies existing manufacturing parameters (such as deposition conditions, temperature, or chemical ratios) to simultaneously achieve silicon nitride formation and trap-enhancing-additive incorporation. This parameter optimization allows the manufacturing process to produce the composite material in a streamlined manner, reducing the impact of added complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If more trap-enhancing-additives are added to increase trap density, then charge retention improves, but the material composition becomes more complex and harder to control

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecharge retentionVSAvoidcomposition control
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent establishes specific parameter ranges for trap-enhancing-additive concentrations (e.g., carbon: 0.2-20 atomic percent, boron: 0.2-20 atomic percent, phosphorus: 0.2-20 atomic percent, metal: 0.2-20 atomic percent). These controlled parameter specifications enable precise composition control during manufacturing while ensuring sufficient trap density for improved charge retention.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies local quality by concentrating trap-enhancing-additives specifically within the charge-trapping-material layer rather than distributing them uniformly throughout the entire memory cell structure. This localized application improves composition control precision by limiting the complexity to a specific region where it is most needed for charge retention.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS12009436B2Memory cells and integrated assemblies having charge-trapping-material with trap-enhancing-additive
Publication Date: 2024.06.11 MICRON TECHNOLOGY INC
  • US12009436B2 patent drawing
  • US12009436B2 patent drawing
  • US12009436B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Some embodiments include a memory cell having charge-trapping-material between a semiconductor channel material and a gating region. The charge-trapping-material includes silicon, nitrogen and trap-enhancing-additive. The trap-enhancing-additive includes one or more of carbon, phosphorus, boron and metal. Some embodiments include an integrated assembly having a stack of alternating first and second levels. The first levels include conductive structures and the second levels are insulative. Channel-material-pillars extend through the stack. Charge-trapping-regions are along the channel-material-pillars and are between the channel-material-pillars and the conductive structures. The charge-trapping-regions include a charge-trapping-material which contains silicon, nitrogen and trap-enhancing-additive. The trap-enhancing-additive includes one or more of carbon, phosphorus, boron and metal.