Chargemaster Rate Change Detection for Insurer Cost Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Insurance companies face challenges in controlling costs due to healthcare providers' ability to unilaterally increase chargemaster rates, leading to unpredictable reimbursement expenses, as existing systems lack effective mechanisms to detect and respond to changes in billing codes and prices in real-time.

Innovation Solution

A computerized analysis system that retrieves claimline data, identifies changepoints in billing codes, and alerts users to potential chargemaster increases, allowing for the calculation of adjusted discounts and the creation of new contracts to mitigate rate hikes, thereby providing insurers with better cost control and transparency.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If insurers rely on provider's chargemaster rates with discount agreements, then reimbursement is simplified, but insurers are exposed to unpredictable rate increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereimbursement processVSAvoidcost predictability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary detection of chargemaster changes by continuously monitoring provider billing data before insurers are billed. This early warning capability allows insurers to identify rate increases proactively, assess their financial impact, and negotiate adjusted rates before being exposed to the increased charges, thus maintaining operational simplicity while improving cost predictability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system establishes a feedback loop where insurers receive continuous information about provider chargemaster changes. By analyzing billing data patterns and detecting anomalies, the system provides insurers with actionable intelligence about rate changes, enabling them to respond strategically and maintain better control over reimbursement costs while keeping the discount agreement structure intact

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Reliability

If insurers enter fixed-rate contracts with providers, then cost predictability improves, but flexibility to adapt to market changes decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecost predictabilityVSAvoidcontract flexibility
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables dynamic contract management by continuously monitoring chargemaster data and automatically identifying changes. This allows insurers to transition from static fixed-rate contracts to more dynamic arrangements where rates can be adjusted based on real-time detection of provider pricing changes, market conditions, and utilization patterns, thereby maintaining cost predictability while improving adaptability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system facilitates parameter changes in contracts by detecting when provider chargemaster rates change and providing data-driven insights for contract renegotiation. Insurers can use the detected changes to justify rate adjustments, modify discount percentages, or update contract terms, thus maintaining the benefits of fixed-rate contracting while adapting to changing market conditions through data-backed parameter modifications

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Productivity

If providers raise chargemaster rates without notice, then provider revenue increases, but insurer financial risk increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprovider revenueVSAvoidinsurer financial risk
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies preliminary anti-action by detecting chargemaster rate increases before insurers are negatively impacted. By continuously monitoring provider billing data and using anomaly detection algorithms, the system identifies rate changes early, allowing insurers to take countermeasures such as negotiating rate reductions, adjusting patient routing decisions, or modifying contract terms before the increased rates result in significant financial exposure

Inventive Principle:
Principle #9Preliminary anti-action

Solution Approach 2:

The system creates a feedback mechanism that provides insurers with timely information about provider rate changes. This feedback loop enables insurers to respond strategically to provider revenue increases by analyzing the impact on their own finances and taking appropriate actions, thus converting the harmful effect of unpredictable rate hikes into a manageable situation through informed decision-making

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS11810165B1Computerized time-series analysis for inference of correlated input modifications
Publication Date: 2023.11.07 CIGNA INTPROP
  • US11810165B1 patent drawing
  • US11810165B1 patent drawing
  • US11810165B1 patent drawing

AI summary

A computerized analysis system includes a data retrieval module, a spike filter module, a chargemaster analysis module, and an alert module. The data retrieval module is configured to retrieve claimline data for a period of time from an input data store. The claimline data includes billing codes and prices of the billing codes associated with a provider. The spike filter module is configured to flag and filter price spikes in the claimline data. The chargemaster analysis module is configured to determine whether a changepoint exists in the billing codes in the claimline data. The chargemaster analysis module is configured to identify a chargemaster increase for the provider in response to a statistical parameter of changepoints exceeding a threshold. The alert module is configured to, in response to identification of a chargemaster increase, publish an alert that a chargemaster increase has occurred for the provider.