Charging Device for Densifying Frustoconical Preforms

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current chemical vapor infiltration methods are inefficient for densifying large, frustoconical-shaped porous preforms due to low loading capacity and high manufacturing costs, leading to increased production time and economic penalties.

Innovation Solution

A loading device with a stack of lower and upper crowns, each with injection and evacuation orifices, allows for optimal nesting of preforms and independent gas supply to minimize densification gradients, enabling higher loading capacity and homogenous densification within a reaction chamber.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If preforms are loaded densely in the reaction chamber, then productivity increases, but gas circulation is insufficient leading to poor densification quality

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveloading capacityVSAvoiddensification homogeneity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The reaction chamber is segmented into multiple independent gas circulation zones using partition walls. Each zone can independently supply reactive gas to preforms through dedicated injection orifices, allowing dense loading while maintaining uniform gas distribution and densification quality across all preforms

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Partition walls act as intermediaries that separate gas flow paths while still allowing thermal radiation and heat transfer between zones. These walls with integrated orifices enable independent gas circulation control for each preform position, resolving the conflict between high loading density and uniform gas supply

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Manufacturing precision

If large spaces are left between preforms for gas circulation, then densification quality improves, but loading capacity decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedensification homogeneityVSAvoidloading capacity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The reaction chamber is divided into multiple independent circulation zones using partition walls with injection orifices. This segmentation allows gas to be delivered directly to each preform position without requiring large inter-preform spaces, thereby increasing loading capacity while maintaining uniform gas distribution and densification quality

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Gas circulation is transitioned from relying on lateral spaces between preforms to a vertical/direct delivery system through partition walls with orifices. This dimensional change in gas flow path enables dense preform arrangement while ensuring adequate gas supply to each position

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Productivity

If multiple preforms are loaded simultaneously, then productivity increases, but gas distribution becomes uneven causing densification gradients

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing throughputVSAvoiddensification uniformity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

Multiple preforms are processed simultaneously in separate circulation zones defined by partition walls. Each zone has independent gas injection through orifices in the partition walls, ensuring uniform gas distribution to all preforms while maintaining high processing throughput

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Each circulation zone is equipped with locally optimized gas injection through orifices positioned in partition walls adjacent to each preform. This local quality approach ensures that each preform receives appropriate gas supply regardless of overall chamber loading, eliminating densification gradients while maintaining high productivity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution significantly increases the loading volume and homogeneity of densification, reduces production downtime, and enhances the productivity of the densification process by ensuring uniform gas flow and circulation around each preform, minimizing pressure drops and densification gradients.

Implementation Method 1

The preheating of the reactant gas is usually carried out by passing the gas through a preheating zone located in the reaction chamber

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectConvection: Convection

Implementation Method 2

The densification of porous preforms by chemical vapor infiltration consists in placing the substrates in a reaction chamber of an infiltration installation by means of support equipment and in admitting into the chamber a reactive gas

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectChemical vapor infiltration: Chemical Vapour Deposition

Implementation Method 3

a first stack of a plurality of lower crowns arranged on the support plate, each lower crown comprising a plurality of injection orifices... a second stack of a plurality of upper crowns, each upper crown comprising a plurality of evacuation orifices

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPressure gradient: Pressure Gradient

Data Source

PatentEP2870272B1Charging device and installation for densifying stackable frustoconical porous preforms
Publication Date: 2016.06.22 GERAKL
  • EP2870272B1 patent drawingFigure 1A
  • EP2870272B1 patent drawingFigure 1B
  • EP2870272B1 patent drawingFigure 1C

AI summary

Charging device (100) for densifying porous preforms (160-163) of stackable shape in a reaction chamber of an infiltration furnace by controlled flow chemical vapour infiltration, the device comprising: - a support plate (110), - a first stack of a plurality of lower rings (140-144) placed on the support plate (110) and comprising a plurality of injection orifices extending between the outer periphery and the inner periphery of each ring, - a second stack of a plurality of upper rings (150-154) comprising a plurality of discharge orifices extending between the outer periphery and the inner periphery of each ring, - a first non-porous wall (130) of a shape and size identical to those of the porous preforms (160-163) that are to be densified and arranged on the support plate (110) inside the lower rings (140-144) of the first stack, said first non-porous wall extending between the support plate and the upper ring situated at the base of the second stack, - a second non-porous wall (170) of a shape and size identical to those of the porous preforms (160-163) that are to be densified, said second non-porous wall extending between the lower ring (143) situated at the top of the first stack and the upper ring (154) situated at the top of the second stack.