Autonomous Device Charging Mode Selection Controller

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Autonomous devices with rechargeable energy storage units face challenges in efficiently managing charging modes to optimize battery life, minimize costs, and avoid parking fees, particularly in determining the most cost-effective charging options and scheduling charging sessions based on user-defined departure times or state of charge thresholds.

Innovation Solution

A system and method that employs a controller to assess local charging infrastructure and parking options, selecting between open-ended, defined departure, and idle charging modes based on cost-effectiveness and user-defined parameters, including derating charging currents and employing zero current when necessary, while continuously monitoring available charging stations and notifying users through a mobile application.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of time

If high charging current is applied to quickly charge the battery, then charging time is reduced, but battery life and reliability deteriorate due to increased lithium plating

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecharging timeVSAvoidbattery life
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts charging current based on real-time conditions including state of charge, temperature, and time remaining before departure. The controller transitions between different charging modes (standard charging, fast charging, trickle charging) to optimize both charging speed and battery protection, resolving the contradiction between quick charging and battery longevity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes charging parameters (current level, charging mode) based on the charging state and environmental conditions. By monitoring state of charge windows and temperature, the controller adjusts charging current to prevent lithium plating while minimizing charging time, thus resolving the contradiction between speed and reliability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Duration of action of moving object

If the vehicle remains at the charging station for extended periods to ensure full charging, then charging completeness is improved, but parking fees and operational costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecharging completenessVSAvoidparking fees
Core Design Contradiction:
Duration of action of moving objectVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary assessment of charging needs by evaluating state of charge, departure time, and required charge level before initiating charging. By calculating the minimum necessary charging duration and selecting appropriate charging modes, the system achieves sufficient charging without unnecessary extended停留, thus reducing parking fees while ensuring charging completeness

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The autonomous device independently monitors its own charging state and makes decisions about charging duration and mode without external intervention. The controller continuously evaluates whether charging objectives are met and terminates charging when sufficient, eliminating wasteful extended parking and associated fees

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Adaptability or versatility

If multiple charging modes are available for selection, then adaptability and charging optimization are improved, but device complexity increases due to additional control logic

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecharging mode selectionVSAvoidcontrol logic
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The charging system is segmented into distinct charging modes (standard charging mode, fast charging mode, trickle charging mode) with clearly defined operating conditions. Each mode has specific state of charge windows and temperature ranges where it is applicable, making the control logic more manageable and easier to implement while maintaining high adaptability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different charging modes are applied to different local conditions (state of charge windows, temperature ranges, time constraints). The controller selects appropriate charging modes based on current operating conditions, providing localized optimization without requiring complex global control logic across all possible scenarios

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

4Loss of time

If derating charging current is applied to complete charging at predefined departure time, then charging schedule adherence is improved, but charging speed and power reduction occurs

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedeparture time adherenceVSAvoidcharging power
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSPower

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts charging current to match the time remaining before departure. As departure approaches, the controller derates charging power to ensure charging completes exactly at the scheduled time. This dynamic adjustment optimizes the balance between charging speed and departure time adherence, applying full power only when sufficient time remains

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS10218196B1Selection of charging modes for autonomous device
Publication Date: 2019.02.26 GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS LLC
  • US10218196B1 patent drawing
  • US10218196B1 patent drawing

AI summary

A system of selecting charging modes for a rechargeable energy storage unit in an autonomous device includes a controller having a processor and tangible, non-transitory memory on which is recorded instructions. The controller is configured to determine availability of at least one charging station and at least one parking lot through a survey of local charging infrastructure and local parking infrastructure, respectively, within a predefined radius of the autonomous device. The controller is configured to determine if it is cost-effective during an excursion to incur a charging fee at the charging station or incur a parking fee at the parking lot. If it is cost-effective to incur the charging fee, then the controller is configured to selectively employ at least one of a plurality of charging modes, including an open-ended charging mode and a defined departure charging mode.