Two-Part Chassis Connector for Transverse Load Decoupling

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing chassis connectors face issues with mechanical stress, environmental exposure, misconnection, and limited design flexibility due to strict global installation dimensions, leading to increased failure frequency and wear.

Innovation Solution

A two-part chassis connector design with a first part secured to the rear side of a mounting plate and a second part to the front, featuring a supporting skirt region and mechanical locking elements, allowing for decoupling of transverse loading forces and enabling precise mating with cable connectors, while adapting to various mounting plate thicknesses and maintaining compatibility with standard dimensions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If a single-piece chassis connector design is used, then manufacturing is simpler, but the connector cannot effectively decouple transverse loading forces leading to increased mechanical stress and wear

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconnector manufacturing simplicityVSAvoidmechanical stress resistance
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The chassis connector is divided into two separate parts: a first part that receives the cable connector and a second part that is fastened to the mounting plate. This segmentation allows the first part to be optimized for signal transmission while the second part handles mechanical mounting and force absorption, thereby resolving the contradiction between manufacturing simplicity and mechanical stress resistance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Adaptability or versatility

If standard global installation dimensions are strictly followed, then compatibility with existing mounting infrastructure is maintained, but design flexibility for adapting to different mounting plate thicknesses is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedesign flexibilityVSAvoidinstallation dimension standardization
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The second part of the chassis connector is designed with adaptable features that allow it to accommodate different mounting plate thicknesses while maintaining standard external dimensions. This dynamic design enables the connector to adjust to varying installation conditions without compromising the standardized interface, thus resolving the contradiction between adaptability and manufacturing precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Device complexity

If the chassis connector is designed without a supporting skirt region, then the structure is simpler, but transverse loading forces cannot be decoupled leading to increased wear and failure

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconnector structure complexityVSAvoiddurability under mechanical stress
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The connector structure is segmented into functional regions, including a supporting skirt region in the second part that provides structural support and decouples transverse loading forces from the signal transmission contacts. This segmentation adds necessary complexity to improve reliability without overwhelming the overall design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The supporting skirt region acts as an intermediary structural element between the mounting plate and the cable connector interface. It mediates the transmission of mechanical forces, protecting the delicate signal contacts from transverse loading while maintaining the overall connector integrity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Reliability

If mechanical locking elements are added to prevent misconnection, then connection reliability improves, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconnection accuracyVSAvoidlocking mechanism complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Mechanical locking elements are incorporated into the connector design with asymmetric features that provide reliable anti-misconnection protection. The locking mechanism uses asymmetric geometries that naturally guide proper alignment while preventing incorrect connections, achieving high reliability with minimal added complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

Data Source

PatentUS20250350065A1Chassis connector
Publication Date: 2025.11.13 NEUTRIK
  • US20250350065A1 patent drawing
  • US20250350065A1 patent drawing
  • US20250350065A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A chassis connector is configured to precisely mate a mechanically lockable plug connection with a cable connector matched to the chassis connector as a counterpart, wherein signal transmission is enabled by the closed plug connection. According to a first aspect, the chassis connector is configured with a first part and a second part in at least two parts, both parts are provided for direct fastening to the mounting plate. According to a further aspect, taken on its own or in combination, the connector includes a cover, the cover and a flange provided for mounting on the mounting plate are designed to match each other such that a labyrinth seal and a contact seal are formed when the cover is closed. The labyrinth seal provides a first sealing stage with a throttling effect. The contact seal, including an elastomeric sealing component, provides a second sealing stage following the first sealing stage.