Chassis Cooling Failover for Cross-Chassis Redundancy

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing datacenter cooling systems lack redundancy and flexibility, leading to potential failures in cooling resources when one or more components malfunction, affecting the operation of server chassis.

Innovation Solution

A failover system is implemented using a controller to detect failures in cooling systems, pumps, or power failures, and redistribute cooling resources across independent server chassis through auxiliary input manifolds and power connections, ensuring continued operation and increased redundancy.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If cooling systems operate with individual independent components, then system reliability is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecooling system reliabilityVSAvoidcooling system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The cooling system is divided into independent chassis-level cooling zones, where each chassis has its own cooling resources and control. This segmentation allows individual chassis to maintain cooling functionality independently, improving reliability while managing complexity through modular design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Cooling resources are pre-configured and allocated at the chassis level before failures occur. The system establishes redundant cooling paths and pre-positions cooling resources so that when a failure occurs, the failover can happen immediately without complex real-time coordination, thus improving reliability while keeping the control mechanism relatively simple.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Adaptability or versatility

If cooling resources are redistributed dynamically, then adaptability is improved, but control complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecooling resource adaptabilityVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The cooling system enables dynamic redistribution of cooling resources at the chassis level through automated control. When a chassis experiences failure or increased cooling demand, the system can dynamically allocate cooling resources from other chassis, providing adaptability while the automated nature of the control reduces the perceived complexity for operators.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system incorporates monitoring and feedback mechanisms that track cooling resource usage and system status across chassis. This feedback enables automatic adjustment and redistribution of cooling resources based on real-time conditions, improving adaptability while the automated feedback loop simplifies the control complexity by removing manual intervention requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS12446196B2Chassis cooling resource
Publication Date: 2025.10.14 HEWLETT PACKARD ENTERPRISE DEV LP
  • US12446196B2 patent drawing
  • US12446196B2 patent drawing
  • US12446196B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Example implementations relate to a chassis cooling resource. In some examples, a chassis cooling resource includes a controller, comprising instructions to detect a failure corresponding to a first cooling system of a first chassis coupled to a server rack, and alter settings of a second cooling system of a second chassis coupled the server rack to provide additional cooling resources to the first cooling system in response to the detected failure.