Chassis Frame Torsional Rigidity via Rectangular Tubes

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Long chassis frames in vocational truck vehicles are prone to bending and twisting due to exerted forces and torques during parking, potentially leading to permanent deformation, which existing solutions attempt to address through aftermarket sub-bases but may not provide sufficient rigidity.

Innovation Solution

A chassis frame design featuring right and left side rails joined by crossmembers, with rectangular tubes and uniting members providing additional support and torsional rigidity, fabricated from steel to enhance structural stability.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Length of moving object

If a long chassis frame is used for vocational truck vehicles, then the vehicle can accommodate vocational equipment and achieve desired length, but the chassis frame becomes prone to bending and twisting under forces and torques

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvechassis frame lengthVSAvoidchassis frame rigidity
Core Design Contradiction:
Length of moving objectVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The chassis frame is segmented into multiple structural components: side rails with channels, rectangular tubes positioned on top walls, and uniting members connecting them. This segmentation allows each component to contribute specifically to torsional rigidity while maintaining the overall long length needed for vocational use.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The chassis frame employs a composite structural approach by combining channel sections, rectangular tubes, and uniting members into an integrated assembly. This composite construction creates a more rigid structure that resists bending and twisting forces better than a simple channel section alone.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Stability of the object's composition

If aftermarket sub-bases are added to rigidify the chassis frame, then structural stability improves, but device complexity and manufacturing cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvechassis frame rigidityVSAvoidstructural component complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The structural features that provide rigidity are merged directly into the chassis frame construction itself. The rectangular tubes and uniting members are integrated as part of the frame assembly, eliminating the need for separate aftermarket sub-bases and reducing overall system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The rigidity-enhancing features are built into the chassis frame during original manufacturing rather than being added later as aftermarket modifications. This preliminary incorporation of structural reinforcements simplifies the overall system by eliminating subsequent installation steps.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS8424913B1Chassis frame of a vehicle
Publication Date: 2013.04.23 INT TRUCK INTPROP CO LLC
  • US8424913B1 patent drawing
  • US8424913B1 patent drawing
  • US8424913B1 patent drawing

AI summary

A chassis frame has a right side rail and a left side rail running lengthwise of the frame opposite each other and joined together by at least one crossmember. A rectangular tube overlies, and has underlying support by, the top wall of the respective side rail. A right uniting member runs lengthwise of the frame for uniting the right rectangular tube and the right side rail in assembly, and a left uniting member runs lengthwise of the frame for uniting the left rectangular tube and the left side rail in assembly. Each uniting member has a horizontal flange overlying and joined to the respective rectangular tube, and a vertical flange extending downward from the respective horizontal flange and joined to the respective side rail.