Server Chassis Lateral Plate Restraining Mechanism

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional server chassis designs face challenges in preventing lateral plates from falling off during unlocking, posing risks of device damage and personnel injury due to the weight and instability of the plates.

Innovation Solution

A chassis structure with a restraining mechanism that includes resilient components, such as hooks and protrusions, which abut to control the pivotal angle of the lateral plate, positioning it at a supporting position to prevent falling and facilitate safe detachment and installation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Stability of the object's composition

If the lateral plate is made heavy for structural stability, then the stability of the object's composition is improved, but the ease of operation deteriorates because users cannot easily hold the plate during unlocking

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural stabilityVSAvoidease of holding during unlocking
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The lateral plate is divided into multiple segments or sections that can be independently supported by separate restraining mechanisms. This segmentation allows each section to be lighter while collectively maintaining structural stability, and enables users to operate one section at a time rather than handling the entire heavy plate at once.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Restraining mechanisms act as intermediary elements between the lateral plate and the chassis body. These intermediaries provide support and control during the unlocking operation, allowing users to manipulate the plate without directly bearing its full weight, thus improving ease of operation while maintaining stability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Strength

If the lateral plate is made heavy for structural stability, then the strength is improved, but the object-generated harmful factors worsen due to potential damage from falling plate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural strengthVSAvoiddamage risk from falling plate
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The restraining mechanisms are engaged before the unlocking operation begins and remain active throughout the process. This preliminary anti-action counteracts the gravitational force on the lateral plate, preventing it from falling and causing damage, while still allowing the plate to be strong enough for structural requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #9Preliminary anti-action

Solution Approach 2:

The weight of the lateral plate, which could be harmful if it caused falling damage, is converted into a beneficial force. The restraining mechanisms utilize the plate's weight to maintain firm engagement during normal operation, while controlled release mechanisms allow safe detachment when needed, transforming the potential harm into operational benefit.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #22Blessing in disguise (Convert harm into benefit)

3Device complexity

If conventional locking mechanisms are used without restraining mechanisms, then the device complexity is reduced, but the reliability deteriorates because the lateral plate may fall off accidentally

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemechanism complexityVSAvoidprevention of accidental falling
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The restraining mechanism is merged with the existing locking mechanism into a single integrated assembly. The restraining components are combined with the locking components share common structural elements and mounting points, reducing overall device complexity while providing both locking and restraining functions to prevent accidental falling.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

4Reliability

If a restraining mechanism is added to prevent lateral plate from falling, then the reliability is improved, but the device complexity increases due to additional components

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprevention of lateral plate falloutVSAvoidnumber of restraining components
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The locking and restraining mechanisms are designed with multi-functionality. The same structural components serve both locking and restraining purposes, and the mechanisms can operate in multiple modes (locked, restrained, and fully open positions). This universality reduces the number of separate components needed while maintaining high reliability for preventing lateral plate fallout.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution effectively prevents lateral plate fallout, enhances user safety, and simplifies the detachment and installation process by maintaining the plate at a stable supporting position, reducing the risk of damage to devices and personnel.

Implementation Method 1

at least a portion of the restraining hook is made of resilient material. The restraining protrusion pushes the restraining hook to resiliently deform the restraining hook for allowing the lateral plate to pivot to an open position through the supporting position

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElastic deformation: Elasticity

Data Source

PatentUS11877419B2Chassis structure and electronic device therewith
Publication Date: 2024.01.16 WISTRON CORP
  • US11877419B2 patent drawing
  • US11877419B2 patent drawing
  • US11877419B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A chassis structure is provided and includes a main body, a lateral plate and a restraining mechanism. The lateral plate is detachably installed on the main body. The restraining mechanism is disposed between the main body and the lateral plate. The restraining mechanism includes a first restraining component and a second restraining component. The first restraining component is disposed on one of the main body and the lateral plate. The second restraining component is disposed on another one of the main body and the lateral plate. The first restraining component is configured to abut against the second restraining component to restrain a pivotal angle of the lateral plate relative to the main body for positioning the lateral plate at a supporting position relative to the main body, so as to prevent the lateral plate from falling off. Besides, an electronic device having the aforementioned chassis structure is provided.