Chassis Packet Forwarding with Congestion-Aware Adaptive Routing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Adaptive routing technologies are difficult to apply to chassis-shaped devices due to their complex architecture, and existing methods rely on proprietary protocols, increasing implementation complexity and resource consumption.

Innovation Solution

A packet forwarding method for chassis-shaped devices that considers both the congested state and role of outbound interfaces, using standard BGP protocols to determine optimal paths and reduce complexity by integrating adaptive routing into chassis-shaped devices.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If adaptive routing is implemented based on proprietary routing protocols in case-shaped devices, then packet forwarding flexibility is improved, but device complexity and implementation difficulty increase when applied to chassis-shaped devices

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepacket forwarding flexibilityVSAvoidimplementation complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies universality by enabling chassis-shaped devices to implement adaptive routing functionality that was previously only available in case-shaped devices. The system achieves this by using standard BGP protocols instead of proprietary protocols, allowing the same adaptive routing mechanism to work across different device types (case-shaped and chassis-shaped), thereby eliminating the need for device-specific implementations and reducing complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the protocol parameter from proprietary routing protocols to standard BGP protocols. This parameter change fundamentally simplifies the implementation in chassis-shaped devices by leveraging widely-supported standard protocols rather than requiring custom proprietary protocol stacks, thus reducing implementation complexity while maintaining adaptive routing capabilities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Device complexity

If standard BGP protocols are used instead of proprietary protocols, then implementation complexity is reduced, but routing control precision may be compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimplementation complexityVSAvoidrouting control precision
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by enhancing the standard BGP protocol implementation with device-specific congestion state information and role-based interface selection. While using standard BGP for basic routing functionality, the system locally augments it with proprietary elements (congestion state monitoring, interface role identification) only where needed to maintain precision, thus achieving a balance between standardization and control precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary mechanism that sits between the standard BGP protocol and the routing decision-making process. This intermediary layer processes congestion state information and interface role data, then feeds refined routing decisions back to the BGP protocol, thereby maintaining routing control precision while using standard protocols.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Productivity

If multiple forwarding chips are used in chassis-shaped devices, then processing capacity is improved, but path selection complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing capacityVSAvoidpath selection complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies segmentation by dividing the path selection process into distinct functional segments: congestion state monitoring, interface role identification, and BGP route selection. Each forwarding chip independently performs these segmented tasks based on local congestion information, rather than requiring centralized control for the entire multi-chip system, thus managing path selection complexity while maintaining high processing capacity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent enables self-service by allowing each forwarding chip to autonomously make routing decisions based on locally monitored congestion states and pre-configured interface roles. Rather than requiring complex inter-chip coordination for path selection, each chip independently selects optimal paths using standard BGP protocols enhanced with local congestion information, thereby simplifying multi-chip path selection while maintaining high processing capacity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS12494995B2Packet forwarding method and apparatus
Publication Date: 2025.12.09 HUAWEI TECH CO LTD
  • US12494995B2 patent drawing
  • US12494995B2 patent drawing
  • US12494995B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A packet forwarding method and apparatus are described that pertain to the field of communication technologies. During selecting, from outbound interfaces of a plurality of forwarding chips, an outbound interface used for packet forwarding, a chassis-shaped device considers both: a role of the outbound interface (whether the outbound interface is an outbound interface of a shortest path or an outbound interface of a non-shortest path), and a congested state of the outbound interface. As such, the chassis-shaped device flexibly selects a forwarding path for a data packet based on a congestion situation of the forwarding path. In this way, an application of an adaptive routing technology is extended to the chassis-shaped device.