Vehicle Chassis Sensor Safety System with Tracking Unit

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Modern vehicles rely heavily on accurate sensor data from chassis sensors, which are vulnerable to attacks, malfunctions, or replacement, compromising safety in autonomous or semi-autonomous driving systems.

Innovation Solution

A safety system that integrates a tracking unit with chassis sensors to detect inconsistencies in sensor data by comparing it with trusted data from a tracking unit, using a computing unit to identify discrepancies in driving parameters and locations, and includes an interface to block or filter inconsistent data, thereby enhancing safety without significant modifications to the vehicle's digital architecture.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If chassis sensors are located at the periphery of the vehicle for functional purposes, then sensor coverage and functionality are improved, but vulnerability to attacks, shocks, and replacement increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesensor coverageVSAvoidsensor security
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces an intermediary system consisting of a tracking unit and computing unit that mediates between the chassis sensors and the embedded computer. This intermediary continuously tracks the physical location and state of sensors, verifying sensor data against expected values based on tracking information, thereby detecting tampering or attacks without changing sensor locations

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements continuous feedback by monitoring sensor data and comparing it with trusted data from the tracking unit. When inconsistencies are detected, the system provides feedback to block suspicious data or alert operators, creating a closed-loop security mechanism that responds to potential threats in real-time

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Measurement precision

If multiple chassis sensors are used for accurate autonomous driving decisions, then measurement precision is improved, but the system becomes more vulnerable to attacks and malfunctions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesensor data accuracyVSAvoidattack surface
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by establishing a baseline of trusted sensor data through the tracking unit before processing autonomous driving decisions. The tracking unit pre- validates sensor locations and states, creating a trusted reference framework that enables subsequent detection of anomalies without requiring additional sensors

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent segments the sensor validation function into a separate tracking unit and computing unit, distinct from the main autonomous driving computer. This segmentation isolates the security validation logic, allowing multiple sensors to operate while their data is independently verified, thereby maintaining measurement precision while reducing the attack surface on the core decision-making system

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Reliability

If a safety system is added to detect sensor inconsistencies, then reliability is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevehicle safetyVSAvoidsystem architecture
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The tracking unit and computing unit are designed with multi-functionality, serving both as location tracking devices and as sensor validation systems. By making these components universal, the patent avoids adding dedicated separate systems for each function, thereby improving reliability without proportionally increasing device complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent merges the sensor validation functionality with the existing tracking unit and gateway infrastructure. The computing unit combines tracking data processing with sensor data verification in a single integrated system, reducing overall complexity compared to implementing separate independent validation systems

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

4Speed

If continuous monitoring of sensor data is performed, then detection speed is improved, but computing resource consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinconsistency detection speedVSAvoidcomputing resource usage
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies partial monitoring by focusing computational resources on verifying only the critical aspects of sensor data against tracking information, rather than analyzing every sensor reading in full detail. This selective verification approach enables continuous monitoring at acceptable computing resource levels by prioritizing safety-critical checks

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentEP4084430A1Safety system for vehicle chassis sensors
Publication Date: 2022.11.02 APTIV TECHNOLOGIES AG
  • EP4084430A1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4084430A1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP4084430A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A safety system for a vehicle (100), the vehicle (100) having a tracking unit (130) and at least one chassis sensor (161, 162, 163), the safety system: - receives sensor data from the chassis sensor (161, 162, 163), - receives trusted data from the tracking unit (130), - detects an inconsistency between the sensor data and the trusted data.