Chat System Dialog Recommendations via Context Analysis

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Users of chat information systems face difficulties in understanding the capabilities and effectively utilizing the features of these systems, leading to a need for improved human-CIS interfaces and intelligent dialog recommendations.

Innovation Solution

A method and system for delivering intelligent dialog recommendations in chat information systems, which involve receiving and processing speech-based user inputs, identifying triggering events, and generating proactive recommendations based on context, usage patterns, and environmental factors, presented to users through actionable messages.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If the CIS provides comprehensive information and functionality, then the system capability is improved, but the user understanding and effective utilization deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem capabilityVSAvoiduser understanding
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary analysis of user context, device state, and interaction history before generating recommendations. This allows the system to proactively suggest relevant features and capabilities before users encounter difficulties, making the comprehensive system more accessible without overwhelming users

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The recommendation system acts as an intermediary between the comprehensive CIS capabilities and the user. It translates complex system functionalities into simple, context-relevant suggestions, bridging the gap between system versatility and user comprehension

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Adaptability or versatility

If the CIS interface provides more features and functionalities, then the system versatility is improved, but the interface complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefeature richnessVSAvoidinterface complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The interface is segmented into core functionality and recommended functionality. The recommendation system dynamically divides features into what users currently need versus what is available, presenting only relevant features at each interaction point rather than overwhelming users with all available functionalities simultaneously

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The interface dynamically adapts its complexity based on user context, interaction history, and device state. The recommendation engine adjusts which features are presented and how they are presented, transforming the static complex interface into a dynamic one that simplifies itself based on real-time conditions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Ease of operation

If the CIS provides proactive recommendations, then the user experience is improved, but the system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuser experienceVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system monitors its own interaction patterns, user responses, and contextual data to automatically generate recommendations without requiring external configuration or complex manual intervention. The recommendation engine serves itself by learning from its own operational data and user feedback loops

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS10573309B2Generating dialog recommendations for chat information systems based on user interaction and environmental data
Publication Date: 2020.02.25 GOOGLE LLC
  • US10573309B2 patent drawing
  • US10573309B2 patent drawing
  • US10573309B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Disclosed is the technology for dynamic and intelligent generation of dialog recommendations for the users of chat information systems based on multiple criteria. An example method may include receiving a speech-based user input, recognizing at least a part of the speech-based user input to generate a recognized input, and providing at least one response to the recognized input. The method may further include identifying at least one triggering event, generating at least one dialog recommendation based at least in part on the identification, and presenting the at least one dialog recommendation to a user via a user device.