Chatbot Intent Disambiguation Using Confidence Thresholds

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current chatbots struggle to accurately disambiguate user utterances when multiple intents have similar confidence scores, leading to incorrect interpretations and user confusion.

Innovation Solution

Implement a chatbot system that presents a list of top matching user intent options to the user for disambiguation, using configurable confidence score thresholds and a user intent mapping table to improve intent recognition through user feedback and autolearning.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If the chatbot uses natural language understanding to analyze user requests, then it can respond with coded responses or conversations, but it struggles to accurately disambiguate user utterances when multiple intents have similar confidence scores

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveintent recognition accuracyVSAvoiddisambiguation reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements feedback by presenting multiple intent options with confidence scores to the user and using their selection to refine future intent recognition. The user's choice feeds back into the system to improve accuracy over time, directly addressing the disambiguation reliability issue when confidence scores are similar.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

Instead of attempting to identify a single intent with high confidence, the system takes partial action by presenting the top N intents (where N > 1) to the user. This excessive action of providing more than one option ensures that the correct intent is captured even when confidence scores are ambiguous, resolving the measurement precision problem.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

2Measurement precision

If the chatbot presents multiple user intent options to the user for disambiguation, then user intent prediction accuracy is enhanced, but the conversation becomes more complex and requires additional user interaction

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuser intent prediction accuracyVSAvoidconversation complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies partial action by presenting only the top N intents (a limited subset) rather than all possible intents. This reduces conversation complexity while maintaining the benefit of disambiguation. The excessive action is controlled by limiting the number of options shown, balancing accuracy improvement with conversational simplicity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the parameter of intent presentation by using confidence score thresholds and ranking to determine which intents are shown to the user. By dynamically adjusting which intents are presented based on confidence scores, the system manages conversation complexity while preserving intent prediction accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Ease of operation

If the chatbot uses a single confidence score threshold to determine user intent, then the system is simple to operate, but it leads to incorrect interpretations when confidence scores are similar

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem operation simplicityVSAvoidintent interpretation accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system moves from a single threshold to presenting multiple intent options (partial action) when confidence scores are similar. This maintains ease of operation by automating the decision process while improving accuracy by showing the user the top N intents rather than making a potentially incorrect single-choice decision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses feedback from user selections on presented intent options to refine future intent recognition. This feedback mechanism improves measurement precision over time while keeping the immediate operation simple, as the user only needs to select from predefined options rather than manually configure thresholds.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS20260010735A1Chatbot disambiguation
Publication Date: 2026.01.08 ADP INC
  • US20260010735A1 patent drawing
  • US20260010735A1 patent drawing
  • US20260010735A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A system can include one or more processors, coupled with memory, to select a plurality of intents associated with an input and having confidence scores between a first threshold level and a second threshold level. The one or more processors to determine that a first intent of the plurality of intents is missing from an intent mapping table. The one or more processors to update the intent mapping table to include a label generated for the first intent. The one or more processors to generate a plurality of elements for display via a chatbot interface including the label generated for the first intent and labels for a subset of the plurality of intents. The one or more processors to transmit data to cause a client device to update the chatbot interface to include the plurality of elements in response to the input.