Chaton Cut Gemstone Crown Angle Optimization

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing chaton cut gemstones do not maximize brilliance and light return, as they are limited by conventional angular relationships of facets, which affect the aesthetic appeal and optical properties.

Innovation Solution

A chaton cut gemstone with a crown angle between 40.5° and 42.5° and pavilion angle between 39.5° and 41.5°, where the crown facets are inclined to the girdle and pavilion facets terminate in points, enhancing light return and fire by optimizing facet geometry.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If conventional chaton cut angles are used, then the gemstone can be easily manufactured and reproduced, but the light return and fire are not maximized

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereproducibility of cutVSAvoidlight return
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSIllumination intensity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies parameter changes by precisely defining the crown angle (α) between 40.5° and 42.5° and pavilion angle (β) between 39.5° and 41.5°. These specific angular parameters optimize the facet geometry to maximize light return and fire while maintaining manufacturability through clear numerical specifications.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Ease of manufacture

If conventional chaton cut angles are used, then the gemstone can be easily manufactured, but the fire and brilliance are reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of reproductionVSAvoidfire
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSIllumination intensity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent optimizes the fire property by changing the angular parameters of the facet cut. The crown angle (α) is set between 40.5° and 42.5° and pavilion angle (β) between 39.5° and 41.5°, which creates optimal internal light reflections and spectral component separation, thereby enhancing fire while remaining manufacturable.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Device complexity

If conventional chaton cut angles are used, then the gemstone structure is simple, but the scintillation and brilliance are not effectively exhibited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefacet geometry complexityVSAvoidscintillation
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSIllumination intensity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent enhances scintillation and brilliance by optimizing the angular parameters of the facet geometry. The crown angle (α) between 40.5° and 42.5° and pavilion angle (β) between 39.5° and 41.5° create optimal light path configurations that maximize internal reflections and light return, effectively exhibiting scintillation without excessive geometric complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The optimized angular relationships significantly improve light return and fire, resulting in a more brilliant and aesthetically pleasing sparkling effect, measured through enhanced light reflection and dispersion.

Implementation Method 1

These light reflections are produced at the individual facets, which are in special angular relationships to one another characterizing the respective cut

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectLight reflection: Reflection

Implementation Method 2

Fire denotes the property of a gemstone to split the incident white light into its spectral components

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectLight dispersion: Dispersion (of waves)

Data Source

PatentUS10271621B2Gemstone with a chaton cut
Publication Date: 2019.04.30 DSW KRISTALL AG & CO KG
  • US10271621B2 patent drawing
  • US10271621B2 patent drawing
  • US10271621B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A gemstone with a chaton cut has tapering facets of a crown adjoin a flat table all the way round inclined relative to the table. The facets extend as far as a rondist at which the gemstone has the largest transverse dimension. A pavilion of facets, preferably terminating at a point, adjoins below the rondist. The gemstone is at least partially made of glass, and the crown angle (α) is between 40.5° and 42.5°.