Check Authorization System Using Location-Based Risk Scoring

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Check-cashing entities face challenges in assessing the risk of second-party check transactions, particularly for unbanked individuals, due to limited historical data and the difficulty in verifying the legitimacy of checks, leading to higher denial rates and potential losses from fraudulent transactions.

Innovation Solution

A system that utilizes location-related information, biometric data, and positive pay information to generate a risk score for check-cashing transactions, incorporating a repository of employer and check issuer location data to assess the proximity and trustworthiness of transactions, thereby improving the accuracy of risk assessment and reducing fraudulent activities.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If check-cashing entities use traditional risk assessment methods, then they can process transactions quickly, but they suffer from high fraud losses and high denial rates for unbanked individuals

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefraud detection accuracyVSAvoidrisk assessment system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The risk assessment system is segmented into multiple independent components: positive pay file verification, location-based risk scoring, biometric verification, and historical data analysis. Each component processes specific aspects of risk independently, allowing the system to maintain high reliability while managing complexity through modular architecture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary location-based risk score that mediates between traditional risk assessment methods and transaction approval decisions. This intermediary layer aggregates multiple data sources (positive pay information, location data, biometric verification) and transforms them into a unified risk metric, simplifying the overall assessment process while improving accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If check-cashing entities deny transactions for unbanked individuals due to lack of historical data, then they reduce potential fraud losses, but they lose legitimate customers and revenue opportunities

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetransaction legitimacy verificationVSAvoidservice accessibility to unbanked population
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system changes the parameters used for risk assessment from traditional bank account history to alternative parameters including location-based risk scores, positive pay file verification results, and biometric verification data. This parameter substitution enables the system to assess unbanked individuals fairly while maintaining reliability in detecting fraudulent transactions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary actions by building location-based risk profiles and positive pay file databases before transactions occur. By pre-establishing these reference data sources, the system can quickly and accurately verify unbanked individuals without requiring traditional banking history, thus improving both reliability and service accessibility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Reliability

If check-cashing entities implement comprehensive fraud detection measures, then they reduce fraudulent transactions, but they increase processing time and operational complexity

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefraud detection capabilityVSAvoidtransaction processing speed
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by pre-building location-based risk profiles and positive pay file databases before transactions occur. This advance preparation allows the system to quickly retrieve and compare transaction data against established reference information, maintaining high fraud detection capability while minimizing processing time during actual transactions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces manual mechanical verification processes with automated electronic systems that query positive pay files, calculate location-based risk scores, and perform biometric verification automatically. This substitution eliminates time-consuming manual checks while maintaining comprehensive fraud detection, thus preserving productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Data Source

PatentUS7783563B2Systems and methods for identifying payor location based on transaction data
Publication Date: 2010.08.24 FIRST DATA CORP
  • US7783563B2 patent drawing
  • US7783563B2 patent drawing
  • US7783563B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods are described for building, maintaining, and using a repository of information about payors of second-party checks presented at a check-cashing entity for cashing. In various embodiments, the repository comprises stored information useful for determining the location of a payor of a second-party check. In one embodiment, information from the check that identifies an account on which the check is drawn, such as magnetic ink character recognition (MICR) line information from a paycheck, is used to access a repository of employer location information. In one embodiment, the payor location information is used to determine a proximity between the payor location and the check cashing entity location. In one embodiment, when a check is presented for which stored payor location information is not available, identifying information about the payor and/or the payor location is requested and is added to the repository.