Integrated Check Engine for UI Component Validation
Find Innovative SolutionsGenerate Solutions
Solution Overview
Problem
Design time applications lack an efficient mechanism for checking and modifying user interface components without requiring frequent saving and re-loading, which is time-consuming and resource-intensive.
Innovation Solution
Integrating a check engine within the design time application to perform checks on UI components, store results in a buffer, and merge changes with the original component, allowing for editing and annotation without the need for frequent saving, and storing the merged component and results in a repository.
Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles
Engineering Contradiction Analysis
1Reliability
If developers save and re-load UI components frequently to check modifications, then component validation accuracy is improved, but development time and resource usage increase
Solution Approach 1:
The check engine performs validation checks on UI components automatically as they are modified in the design-time application, before the developer needs to save and re-load the component. This preliminary validation action eliminates the need for frequent save-reload cycles, maintaining validation accuracy while reducing development time.
Solution Approach 2:
The system provides immediate feedback about component validity through the check engine, which continuously monitors and validates component properties as they change. This real-time feedback mechanism allows developers to see validation results instantly without waiting for save-reload cycles, improving both validation reliability and development efficiency.
2Stability of the object's composition
If developers save each iteration of UI component modifications, then component state is preserved, but resource usage and processing overhead increase
Solution Approach 1:
The check engine performs validation before the save operation, identifying and reporting issues in advance. This allows developers to correct problems before saving, reducing the need for multiple save iterations and thereby reducing resource usage while maintaining component state integrity.
Solution Approach 2:
The check engine automatically validates components and provides guidance for corrections without requiring developer intervention to save and re-load. This self-service validation reduces the frequency of save operations needed, lowering resource usage while preserving component state.
3Productivity
If a check engine is integrated into the design time application, then validation efficiency is improved, but application complexity increases
Solution Approach 1:
The check engine is integrated directly into the design-time application architecture, combining validation functionality with the existing component editing interface. This merging eliminates the need for separate validation tools or processes, improving validation efficiency while managing complexity through unified architecture.
Solution Approach 2:
The check engine serves multiple functions within the design-time application: validating component properties, providing real-time feedback, guiding corrections, and working with various UI component types. This multi-functionality justifies the added complexity by delivering comprehensive validation capabilities across the entire development workflow.
Data Source
AI summary
A method, including executing instructions recorded on a non-transitory computer-readable storage media using at least one processor, may include loading a component from a repository in a first user interface, notifying a second user interface that the component is loaded in the first user interface, performing one or more checks on the component using a check engine and generating one or more check results, storing the check results in a buffer and displaying the check results in the second user interface. The first user interface, the second user interface, the buffer and the check engine may be integrated modules of a single application.