Automated Check Strip Control for Precise Field Yield Comparison

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current agricultural systems face challenges in accurately implementing and analyzing check strip operations, as they often require manual intervention and pre-definition of check strip locations, leading to potential misalignment and reduced effectiveness in yield comparison.

Innovation Solution

An agricultural machine system that dynamically senses and controls check strip operations, detecting the start and end locations and dimensions of check strips during operation, allowing for precise execution and post-harvest analysis without pre-definition, using a control system that includes a check strip trigger detector, start and end location identifiers, and a check strip control system to manage the transition between standard and check strip operations.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If check strip locations are pre-defined, then the operation can be planned in advance, but misalignment occurs during actual execution reducing effectiveness

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveeffectiveness of yield comparisonVSAvoidalignment accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by pre-defining check strip locations and parameters before field operations. The controller is programmed with check strip location data beforehand, allowing the agricultural operation to automatically switch to check strip mode when reaching those pre-defined locations, ensuring both advance planning and accurate execution

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses feedback from GPS/location sensors to continuously monitor the machine's position and automatically adjust operations. When the machine reaches a pre-defined check strip location, the system receives location feedback and automatically switches between check strip and normal operations, eliminating manual intervention and ensuring precise alignment

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Ease of operation

If manual intervention is required to change operations in check strips, then flexibility is maintained, but accuracy and consistency are reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanual control flexibilityVSAvoidoperation consistency
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs self-service by automatically detecting when the agricultural machine enters and exits check strip areas using GPS/location sensors. The controller autonomously switches between check strip operations and normal operations without requiring manual operator intervention, ensuring consistent and repeatable operations while maintaining the ability to change parameters

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system replaces manual mechanical control with an automated electronic control system. The controller uses electronic signals from location sensors to automatically adjust operational parameters, substituting human manual intervention with an automated feedback-based control mechanism that improves consistency and precision

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Adaptability or versatility

If check strip operations are manually controlled, then adaptability is possible, but time consumption and productivity are reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperation adaptabilityVSAvoidfield operation efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements dynamic operation by allowing real-time switching between check strip and normal operational modes based on the machine's location. The controller dynamically adjusts operational parameters (such as seed rate, spray rate, or harvesting intensity) automatically as the machine enters and exits check strip areas, maintaining adaptability while eliminating manual intervention time

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system ensures continuous useful action by automatically managing check strip operations without interrupting the overall field operation. The transitional periods for manual intervention are eliminated, allowing the machine to maintain continuous operation throughout the field while still performing check strip comparisons, thereby improving productivity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Data Source

PatentUS11266058B2Automated check strips
Publication Date: 2022.03.08 DEERE & CO
  • US11266058B2 patent drawing
  • US11266058B2 patent drawing
  • US11266058B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An agricultural machine performs a prescribed agricultural operation in a field. The machine is controlled to change the agricultural operation to a check strip operation. A location where the check strip operation is commenced is sensed and a location where the check strip operation ceases is also sensed. A dimension of the check strip, and its location, are stored.