Check Valve Cracking Pressure Calibration for Cataract Surgery

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing cataract surgery systems using water-jet based liquefaction devices face suboptimum performance due to inaccuracies in determining the cracking pressure of the check valve, leading to mismatched flow rates and pressures, which affect the efficiency of lens removal.

Innovation Solution

A method to determine the pressure corresponding to a predetermined flow rate by incrementally pressurizing the injection fluid container and monitoring the vacuum at the handpiece tip, allowing for precise control of the minimum operating pressure to achieve optimal flow rates during surgical operations.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If the cracking pressure is determined based on assumed theoretical values from spring stiffness and number of turns, then the system design is simplified, but the actual flow rate control precision deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecheck valve design simplicityVSAvoidflow rate control precision
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary calibration before actual use by incrementally pressurizing the container and monitoring vacuum levels to empirically determine the cracking pressure. This preliminary measurement establishes accurate pressure-flow rate correspondence for the specific check valve being used, compensating for manufacturing variations in spring stiffness and ball geometry.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback control by continuously monitoring the vacuum level at the handpiece tip during pressurization. When the vacuum level changes indicating check valve opening, the system uses this feedback signal to identify the actual cracking pressure and adjust subsequent pressure control accordingly, ensuring precise flow rate control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Reliability

If the container pressure is increased to compensate for potential check valve pressure variations, then the flow rate reliability improves, but the energy consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveflow rate reliabilityVSAvoidcontainer pressurization energy
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary calibration to empirically determine the exact cracking pressure for each check valve before use. By knowing the actual cracking pressure rather than using conservative estimates, the system can pressurize the container to the precise minimum required level, avoiding unnecessary energy consumption while ensuring reliable flow rate control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts the container pressure based on the empirically determined cracking pressure and desired flow rate. Rather than maintaining constantly high pressure, the system optimizes pressure levels in real-time based on actual check valve characteristics and operational requirements, reducing energy consumption while maintaining reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach ensures accurate control of the flow rate, enhancing the performance and energy efficiency of the handpiece by determining the correct pressure for the check valve, thereby improving the efficiency of lens removal during cataract surgery.

Implementation Method 1

the fluidics module increases the pump speed until it determines that a predetermined vacuum is present at the tip

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectVacuum: Vacuum

Implementation Method 2

Inside the handpiece is a spring and ball that together construct a check valve

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSpring force: Spring

Implementation Method 3

The cracking pressure of the check valve is the minimum upstream pressure at which the valve will operate

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCracking pressure: Pressure Increase

Data Source

PatentUS7509831B2Method for determining a pressure that corresponds to a flow rate through a check valve
Publication Date: 2009.03.31 ALCON INC
  • US7509831B2 patent drawing
  • US7509831B2 patent drawing
  • US7509831B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The present invention accommodates differences in cracking pressures between check valves by determining a pressure on the input of a check valve that corresponds to a predetermined flow rate at the output of the check valve. A container is incrementally pressurized and the vacuum at a point on the output side of the check valve is monitored. Once fluid begins to pass through the check valve, the vacuum drops. At the predetermined flow rate, the pump cannot maintain a predetermined vacuum level since it cannot exceed a maximum speed. At this point the pressure applied to the container corresponds to the predetermined flow rate. An offset is added to the pressure to determine the minimum operating pressure.