Checkerboard MOM Capacitor Array for CMP Uniformity

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional array-type Metal-Oxide-Metal (MOM) capacitor designs in semiconductor devices face issues such as chemical-mechanical polishing (CMP) problems like dishing and erosion, capacitance mismatch, and shifts in capacitance from array edge to center, leading to degraded device performance and reliability.

Innovation Solution

An enhanced checkerboard array design is introduced, incorporating both operational and dummy capacitors, which minimizes gradient effects and CMP issues by forming a symmetric pattern of operational and dummy capacitors, and electrically coupling non-adjacent capacitors to improve model accuracy and reduce capacitance mismatch.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Quantity of substance

If conventional array-type MOM capacitor designs are used to increase packing density, then capacitance per unit area increases, but CMP issues such as dishing and erosion worsen

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecapacitance per unit areaVSAvoidCMP uniformity
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by creating different capacitor types (operational capacitors with signal connections and dummy capacitors without signal connections) within the same array. The dummy capacitors are strategically placed to compensate for CMP-induced variations in specific regions, thereby maintaining uniform capacitance characteristics across the entire array despite local CMP non-uniformity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces asymmetry by implementing a non-uniform distribution of dummy capacitors within the capacitor array. The dummy capacitors are placed in specific patterns that asymmetically compensate for CMP dishing and erosion effects in different regions of the array, rather than using a symmetric uniform distribution

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

2Quantity of substance

If capacitor array size is increased to improve packing density, then total capacitance increases, but capacitance mismatch across the array worsens

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetotal capacitanceVSAvoidcapacitance matching
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent achieves equipotentiality by ensuring that all capacitors in the array, regardless of their position, have matched capacitance values through the strategic placement of dummy capacitors. This compensation mechanism equalizes the electrical characteristics across the entire array, eliminating potential differences in capacitance that would otherwise arise from position-dependent CMP variations

Inventive Principle:
Principle #12Equipotentiality

3Quantity of substance

If capacitor array size is increased to improve packing density, then total capacitance increases, but capacitance shift from array edge to center worsens

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetotal capacitanceVSAvoidcapacitance uniformity
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by creating different capacitor types (operational capacitors with signal connections and dummy capacitors without signal connections) within the same array. The dummy capacitors are strategically placed to compensate for CMP-induced variations in specific regions, thereby maintaining uniform capacitance characteristics across the entire array despite local CMP non-uniformity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements partial or excessive action by adding dummy capacitors that exceed the minimum required for basic array formation. These additional dummy capacitors are specifically positioned to over-compensate for anticipated CMP variations in certain regions, ensuring that even edge-to-center gradients are minimized across large arrays

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS9406672B2Capacitor arrays for minimizing gradient effects and methods of forming the same
Publication Date: 2016.08.02 TAIWAN SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFACTURING CO LTD
  • US9406672B2 patent drawing
  • US9406672B2 patent drawing
  • US9406672B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods of forming semiconductor devices. The method includes forming a capacitor array comprising a plurality of cells in a two-dimensional grid. The step of forming includes forming a plurality of operational capacitors in a first subset of the plurality of cells along a diagonal of the array, the plurality of operational capacitors comprising a first operational capacitor formed in a cell at a first edge of the capacitor array and at a first edge of the diagonal of the capacitor array. The step of forming also includes forming a plurality of dummy patterns about the plurality of operational capacitors in the capacitor array in a second subset of the plurality of cells to achieve symmetry in the grid about the diagonal. The method also includes electrically coupling each one of the plurality of operational capacitors to another one of the plurality of operational capacitors.