Dynamic Checkout Page Optimization via Machine Learning

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional payment processors lack sufficient data to analyze customer experience effectively, particularly at the checkout page of a purchase transaction funnel, leading to inefficiencies and increased costs due to frustrated customers, higher return rates, and loss of business.

Innovation Solution

An improved payment processor uses machine-learned models to dynamically optimize the checkout page by extracting and analyzing data signals from the checkout page, predicting customer behavior and sentiment, and adjusting the user interface to enhance transaction success and reduce dissatisfaction.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of information

If data is only sourced from the checkout page in conventional payment processor arrangements, then the payment processor can maintain its transactional presence as the last step in the purchase transaction funnel, but the analysis of customer experience is insufficient due to limited data availability

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecustomer experience dataVSAvoiddata collection system
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the data collection process by identifying and extracting specific data signals from different stages of the purchase transaction funnel, not just the checkout page. This includes segmenting user interactions, device information, and transaction data into distinct categories that can be analyzed separately to gain comprehensive customer experience insights.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary analysis layer that processes data signals from the checkout page and other sources. This intermediary system uses machine learning models to transform raw data into actionable insights about customer experience, bridging the gap between limited data availability and comprehensive analysis needs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If conventional payment processors rely only on checkout page data, then system implementation is simpler, but customer sentiment detection is insufficient leading to frustrated customers, higher returns, and chargebacks

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetransaction successVSAvoidoperational efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by detecting customer sentiment and predicting negative outcomes (such as chargebacks or returns) before they occur. The machine learning model analyzes data signals during the checkout process to identify customers at risk of dissatisfaction, allowing the system to take preventive measures before the transaction is completed or reversed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements feedback mechanisms where the analysis results from data signals are fed back into the transaction process. This feedback loop allows the system to continuously learn from customer behavior patterns and improve its ability to predict and prevent negative outcomes, thereby increasing both transaction success rates and operational efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Ease of operation

If the payment processor implements comprehensive data analysis from checkout page signals, then customer satisfaction can be improved by predicting and preventing negative actions, but the computational resources and processing time increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecustomer satisfactionVSAvoidcomputational resources
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies partial action by selectively analyzing specific data signals that are most indicative of customer sentiment and negative outcomes. Rather than processing all possible data equally, the machine learning model focuses on key features such as user interaction patterns, device information, and transaction characteristics that provide the highest predictive value, thereby reducing computational overhead while maintaining accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS20230038609A1Dynamic checkout page optimization to forestall negative user action
Publication Date: 2023.02.09 STRIPE LLC
  • US20230038609A1 patent drawing
  • US20230038609A1 patent drawing
  • US20230038609A1 patent drawing

AI summary

In an example embodiment, a method for processing payments made via an electronic payment processing system is provided. An example method includes obtaining training data from a data source. The training data relates to prior purchases made via the electronic payment processing system, wherein the data source includes, in some examples, only a checkout page in a purchase transaction funnel. Features associated with a negative user action in relation to prior purchases are identified. A machine learning algorithm produces a dynamic transactional behavior score indicative of a probability that a purchase will invoke a negative user action.