Checkpoint Block Storage Device for Data Consistency

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing data storage systems lack the ability to maintain data consistency and automatically rollback to a previous checkpoint state in case of errors or failures, especially between checkpoints.

Innovation Solution

A transaction-based block device method that uses bitmap blocks and header blocks to determine the correct storage region for writing and reading data, ensuring consistency by rolling back to the previous checkpoint state upon restart, with error detection codes for data integrity.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If data is written continuously to storage device without checkpoint mechanisms, then writing speed is improved, but data consistency and reliability deteriorate when errors occur

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvewriting speedVSAvoiddata consistency
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by creating checkpoint markers at predetermined intervals before actual data writing occurs. These checkpoints establish known good states in advance, allowing the system to quickly rollback if errors occur during data writing, thus maintaining both high writing speed and data consistency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The storage device is divided into multiple segments with different checkpoint intervals. Different regions or types of data can have different checkpoint frequencies, allowing frequently written data to use longer intervals for speed while critical data uses shorter intervals for consistency, resolving the contradiction between writing speed and data consistency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Reliability

If checkpoint intervals are shortened to improve data consistency, then reliability is improved, but system complexity and overhead increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata consistencyVSAvoidcheckpoint management complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Different regions of the storage device are assigned different checkpoint intervals based on their specific requirements. Critical data regions use shorter intervals for high reliability, while less critical regions use longer intervals to reduce overhead. This localized approach maintains reliability where needed without unnecessarily increasing overall system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements checkpoints at predetermined intervals that may be more frequent than strictly necessary for all data, but this partial excessive action ensures that even if errors occur, the rollback distance is minimized. This approach provides sufficient reliability without requiring complex dynamic adjustment mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Productivity

If checkpoint intervals are lengthened to reduce overhead, then productivity is improved, but data consistency and rollback capability deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem throughputVSAvoidrollback capability
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The storage system is segmented into multiple regions with different checkpoint intervals. High-throughput regions use longer intervals to maximize productivity, while critical regions use shorter intervals to maintain rollback capability. This segmentation allows the system to achieve high overall throughput while preserving reliability where it matters most.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The checkpoint interval parameter is changed dynamically or configured differently based on data criticality and access patterns. By adjusting this parameter locally rather than uniformly, the system can optimize for productivity in non-critical paths while maintaining rollback capability in critical paths, resolving the contradiction between throughput and reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Reliability

If multiple storage regions are used for checkpointing to improve consistency, then reliability is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata consistencyVSAvoidstorage region management complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The storage device is divided into distinct regions: data storage regions and separate checkpoint marker regions. This segmentation allows independent management of data and checkpoint information, simplifying the complexity by providing clear separation of concerns while maintaining reliability through dedicated checkpoint tracking in separate regions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS9766990B1Checkpoint block storage device
Publication Date: 2017.09.19 DELL EMC
  • US9766990B1 patent drawing
  • US9766990B1 patent drawing
  • US9766990B1 patent drawing

AI summary

A checkpoint device is a transaction-based block device wherein data is committed to non-volatile memory (NVM) or tiered storage upon completion of a checkpoint. Automatic and instant rollback to the previous checkpoint is provided upon restart if any failure occurred during the previous checkpoint. Related techniques are also described.