Chemical Regulation System for Pool Overflow Prevention

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Mechanical issues in conventional pool and spa circulation and chemical treatment systems, such as mineral deposits and impurities, lead to improper chemical feeding and water overflow, causing bacterial build-up and maintenance challenges.

Innovation Solution

A chemical regulation system that includes a pressure regulator, valves, and a controller to manage the flow rate and chemical composition of liquids, preventing overflow and ensuring consistent chemical treatment by regulating the flow of chemicals into a production tank and hopper.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conventional mechanical systems are used for chemical feeding and water circulation, then the system structure is simple, but mineral deposits and impurities cause mechanical failures leading to improper chemical feeding and water overflow

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem reliabilityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces mechanical chemical feeding systems with a pump-based system that uses a controller to regulate chemical flow. The controller monitors water level and chemical concentration, activating the pump only when needed, thereby eliminating mechanical failures from mineral deposits while maintaining system reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system incorporates automatic sensors that detect water level and chemical concentration, enabling the system to self-regulate chemical feeding without manual intervention. This automated feedback mechanism prevents overflow and ensures consistent chemical treatment while reducing mechanical wear.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Reliability

If the shut-off valve is always energized to prevent failures, then the valve remains ready to close, but other mechanical elements cannot properly regulate water intake causing overflow

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevalve reliabilityVSAvoidwater regulation
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses water level sensors to provide feedback to the controller, which then activates or deactivates the shut-off valve and pump based on real-time conditions. This feedback mechanism ensures the valve is energized only when water level requires intervention, preventing overflow while allowing proper regulation of water intake.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The shut-off valve transitions from a static always-energized state to a dynamic state controlled by water level sensors. The valve activates only when the water level exceeds a threshold, enabling both reliable failure prevention and proper water regulation through conditional operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Device complexity

If suction valves are used for chemical release, then the system is simple, but valves may become stuck in closed position leading to insufficient chemical release and bacterial build-up

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem simplicityVSAvoidchemical feeding reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces suction valves with an electrically controlled pump system regulated by a controller. The pump is activated by the controller based on chemical concentration sensors, ensuring consistent chemical release without the risk of valves becoming stuck in closed position.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses chemical concentration sensors to automatically trigger the pump when chemical levels are insufficient. This self-regulating mechanism ensures reliable chemical feeding without manual intervention and prevents bacterial build-up by maintaining proper chemical concentrations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

4Reliability

If mechanical elements are constantly active to prevent failures, then system readiness is improved, but mineral deposits prevent proper functioning causing improper chemical feeding

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem readinessVSAvoidchemical feeding consistency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The pump-based system operates periodically based on sensor feedback rather than continuously. The controller activates the pump only when water level or chemical concentration thresholds are exceeded, reducing mineral deposit accumulation while maintaining system readiness and chemical feeding consistency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Data Source

PatentUS9836068B2Methods and apparatus for a chemical regulation system
Publication Date: 2017.12.05 GEYER MICHAEL J
  • US9836068B2 patent drawing
  • US9836068B2 patent drawing
  • US9836068B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A chemical regulation system according to various embodiments of the present technology is configured to regulate the flow rate of a liquid and monitors the chemical composition of the liquid. The chemical regulation system may comprise various valves, fittings, and couplings configured to regulate the flow of the liquid through a production tank and into a chemical hopper to product a highly concentrated liquid/chemical solution that is provided to the production tank. The chemical regulation system may comprise a controller to electrically control various valves. The chemical regulation system may comprise a device for facilitating the flow of a liquid out of a production tank.