Chemically-Enhanced Sorbent Activation for Mercury Removal

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for removing gaseous pollutants from gas streams, particularly in coal-fired power plants, are inefficient and costly, especially for pollutants like mercury, due to the energy-intensive production of sorbents and low removal efficiency in high-sulfur coal flue gases.

Innovation Solution

Generating a chemically-enhanced activated sorbent by activating a sorbent precursor in the presence of specific chemicals, such as bromine or transition metals, to increase adsorption efficiency, and using these sorbents to convert pollutants into more easily removable forms within the gas stream.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If hydrated lime or lime is produced to remove gaseous pollutants, then removal effectiveness is improved, but production energy consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepollutant removal effectivenessVSAvoidproduction energy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by pre-impregnating the sorbent precursor with chemical agents (such as bromine, iodine, or transition metal compounds) before the activation process. This preliminary chemical treatment enhances the sorbent's effectiveness for mercury and acid gas removal, allowing lower production energies compared to producing high-purity hydrated lime or lime through energy-intensive calcination processes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Reliability

If activated carbon is used to remove mercury from low-sulfur coal flue gases, then removal efficiency is improved, but removal efficiency deteriorates when used for high-sulfur coal flue gases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemercury removal efficiencyVSAvoidadaptability to different coal types
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by incorporating specific chemical impregnants (such as bromine, iodine, or transition metal compounds) into the activated carbon structure. These localized chemical modifications create specific binding sites that enhance mercury affinity and provide resistance to sulfur interference, allowing the sorbent to maintain high effectiveness across different coal types including high-sulfur coals.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates composite sorbent materials by combining activated carbon with chemical impregnants (bromine, iodine, transition metal compounds). This composite structure provides both the physical adsorption capacity of activated carbon and the chemical enhancement needed for effective mercury and acid gas removal from high-sulfur flue gases, significantly improving adaptability across different fuel types.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

3Reliability

If conventional sorbents are used to remove gaseous pollutants, then removal capability is achieved, but production cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepollutant removal capabilityVSAvoidproduction cost
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs disposable activated carbon sorbent cartridges that are relatively inexpensive to produce and replace. These cartridges use activated carbon with chemical impregnants rather than expensive hydrated lime or lime, providing effective pollutant removal at lower cost. The cartridges are designed for easy replacement rather than regeneration, reducing operational complexity and cost.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The chemically-enhanced activated sorbents significantly improve the removal efficiency of gaseous pollutants, including mercury, from gas streams, especially in high-sulfur coal flue gases, while reducing production costs and enhancing the sorbents' effectiveness.

Implementation Method 1

activated carbon is a sorbent used for sorption of mercury species from coal combustion flue gases

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAdsorption: Adsorption

Data Source

PatentUS9555368B2Chemically-enhanced sorbent activation process and method of using same
Publication Date: 2017.01.31 THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE UNIV OF ILLINOIS
  • US9555368B2 patent drawing
  • US9555368B2 patent drawing
  • US9555368B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The invention in its various embodiments is directed to methods and equipment for generating an activated sorbent from a sorbent precursor with the addition of certain chemicals that enhance the effectiveness of the activated sorbent. The invention in its various embodiments is also directed to the methods and equipment for generating some of the chemicals that are added to the raw carbonaceous material or activated sorbent to enhance its effectiveness. The invention in its various embodiments is also directed to methods and equipment for generating certain chemicals that can be added to a gas stream to convert a given gaseous pollutant to a form that is more easily removed from the gas stream.