Chemically-Enhanced Sorbent for Mercury Removal
Find Innovative SolutionsGenerate Solutions
Solution Overview
Problem
Current methods for removing gaseous pollutants from gas streams, particularly in coal-fired power plants, are energy-intensive and inefficient, especially for pollutants like mercury and acid gases, due to the high cost and limited effectiveness of existing sorbents.
Innovation Solution
The development of a method for on-site production of chemically-enhanced activated sorbents using sorbent precursors and additives, such as bromine or transition metals, to increase the adsorption capacity and effectiveness of sorbents for removing gaseous pollutants, including mercury, from flue gases.
Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles
Engineering Contradiction Analysis
1Reliability
If activated carbon is used to remove mercury from flue gases, then mercury removal efficiency is improved, but energy consumption increases and cost increases
Solution Approach 1:
The patent changes the chemical parameters of the sorbent by impregnating activated carbon with halogen compounds (such as bromine, chlorine, or iodine). This chemical modification alters the surface properties and adsorption characteristics of the carbon, enabling more effective mercury removal at lower energy inputs and reduced sorbent dosages compared to untreated activated carbon.
Solution Approach 2:
The patent creates a composite material by combining activated carbon with halogen-containing compounds. This composite structure leverages the high surface area and porosity of activated carbon along with the chemical reactivity of halogen compounds, producing a sorbent that achieves superior mercury removal efficiency while reducing the overall energy consumption and cost associated with using pure activated carbon.
2Reliability
If activated carbon is used to remove mercury from high-sulfur flue gases, then mercury removal efficiency decreases, but if conventional sorbents are used, then production cost increases
Solution Approach 1:
The patent modifies the chemical parameters of the sorbent through halogen impregnation, which enhances its ability to remove mercury even in the presence of high sulfur concentrations. This chemical enhancement allows the use of lower-cost sorbent materials while maintaining effective mercury removal in challenging flue gas conditions, thereby reducing production costs without sacrificing reliability.
Solution Approach 2:
The halogen compound acts as an intermediary that facilitates mercury removal in high-sulfur environments. The halogen impregnated on the sorbent surface creates intermediate chemical species that are more reactive toward mercury, enabling effective removal even when sulfur interferes with the direct adsorption process, thus maintaining efficiency while using cost-effective materials.
3Reliability
If hydrated lime or lime is used to remove acid gases, then removal effectiveness is improved, but energy consumption increases making sorbents expensive
Solution Approach 1:
The patent employs activated carbon impregnated with halogen compounds as a disposable sorbent that can be injected directly into the flue gas stream. This approach replaces expensive, energy-intensive hydrated lime or lime systems with a lower-cost activated carbon-based sorbent that achieves comparable or superior acid gas removal effectiveness without the high energy consumption associated with lime production and processing.
Solution Approach 2:
The patent substitutes the mechanical/thermal process of lime production and heating with a chemical impregnation process. Instead of producing hydrated lime or lime through energy-intensive calcination and hydration processes, the patent uses activated carbon that is chemically modified through halogen impregnation, replacing the mechanical/thermal system with a chemical treatment approach that consumes significantly less energy while maintaining removal effectiveness.
Applied Scientific Principles
This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.
Function Achieved in This Case
This approach enhances the adsorption efficiency of gaseous pollutants, such as mercury, by producing sorbents with improved chemical properties, reducing energy costs and increasing removal efficiency, particularly in flue gases with high sulfur content.
Implementation Method 1
Sorbents are sometimes used to remove certain pollutants from gas streams. For example, sorbents may be injected into a gas stream and collected downstream after adsorbing a targeted vapor phase contaminant.
Implementation Method 2
the invention relates to methods and equipment for the on-site production of an activated sorbent with the addition of certain chemicals that enhance the activity or effectiveness of the activated sorbent to produce a chemically-enhanced activated sorbent
Data Source
AI summary
The invention is directed to methods and equipment for generating an activated sorbent from a sorbent precursor with the addition of certain chemicals that enhance the effectiveness of the activated sorbent. The invention is also directed to the methods and equipment for generating some of the chemicals that are added to the raw carbonaceous material or activated sorbent to enhance its effectiveness. The invention is also directed to methods and equipment for generating certain chemicals that can be added to a gas stream to convert a given gaseous pollutant to a form that is more easily removed from the gas stream. The invention is also directed to methods and equipment for adding an activated sorbent and various chemicals for a gas stream having one or more gaseous pollutants.


