Child Collision Warning Using Behavior Prediction in Vehicles

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current systems fail to accurately detect children in vehicle environments, posing a risk in autonomous driving scenarios due to their lower visibility and awareness compared to adults.

Innovation Solution

A method and system utilizing machine learning processes to distinguish children from adults through image and video analysis, predicting their behavior, and providing timely warnings or responses to prevent collisions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If conventional detection systems are used to detect road users, then general detection capability is maintained, but detection accuracy for children deteriorates due to their lower visibility and smaller size

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection accuracyVSAvoiddifficulty of detecting children
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDifficulty of detecting and measuring

Solution Approach 1:

The detection system is segmented into multiple specialized components: a child detection module specifically trained to identify children, an adult detection module for adults, and a behavior prediction module. This segmentation allows each component to optimize for its specific detection target, improving overall accuracy for detecting children who were previously missed by general-purpose systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

A behavior prediction module acts as an intermediary between raw sensor data and collision risk assessment. This intermediary analyzes detected objects' movement patterns and predicts future positions, providing additional information that helps distinguish children from other objects and improves detection accuracy in challenging visibility conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If the system responds to all detected road users with the same level of alert, then response consistency is maintained, but response effectiveness deteriorates because children require more urgent and specific warnings

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresponse effectivenessVSAvoidcomplexity of response differentiation
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The warning system provides localized quality of response based on the detected target. When a child is detected, the system generates specific child-oriented warnings with higher urgency levels compared to standard pedestrian warnings. This local differentiation of response quality improves effectiveness without requiring complete system redesign.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes multiple parameters of the warning response based on target identification: alert priority level is increased for children, warning message content is modified to specify child detection, and notification timing is adjusted to provide earlier warnings. These parameter changes enable differentiated responses that improve reliability while managing complexity through systematic parameter adjustment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS12054177B2Child forward collision warning
Publication Date: 2024.08.06 AUTOBRAINS TECH LTD
  • US12054177B2 patent drawing
  • US12054177B2 patent drawing
  • US12054177B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for child forward collision warning, the method may include sensing sensed information about an environment of a vehicle; detecting, based on the sensed information, a situation related to the environment; detecting, based on the sensed information, one or more children within the environment; classifying each child of the one or more children to a class; predicting, using a machine leaning process, a future behavior of the one or more children and an impact of the future behavior of the one or more children on a future progress of the vehicle; wherein the predicting of each child of the one or more children is responsive to a class of the child and to the situation; and responding to the predicting.