Child Harness Restraining Web to Prevent Shoulder Strap Escape

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Children can easily manipulate their arms through the underside of the shoulder strap in child safety seats, converting the harness into a potentially dangerous lap harness by removing their shoulders from the strap, which existing solutions like vests are uncomfortable, difficult to use, and not compatible with most child seats.

Innovation Solution

A restraining web that can be integrated into or retrofitted onto child car seats, covering the area below the armpit and abdomen, limiting arm removal by adjusting the gap between the shoulder strap and seat, and attaching to the harness or seat via hook and loop fasteners, ensuring the web is breathable and adjustable for comfort and safety.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a traditional shoulder strap harness is used, then the child seat is simple and comfortable, but the child can easily manipulate their arms through the underside of the shoulder strap, converting the harness into a potentially dangerous lap harness

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveharness safetyVSAvoidharness structure
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The restraining web is divided into multiple functional zones: a first web portion covering the area below the armpit/scapula and a second web portion covering the side of the abdomen. This segmentation allows each portion to perform its specific restraining function while maintaining overall system simplicity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The restraining web acts as an intermediary element between the shoulder strap and the child's body, preventing direct arm manipulation through the strap while distributing restraining forces across multiple body areas (shoulder, armpit, abdomen), thereby enhancing safety without requiring fundamental changes to the harness structure

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If a vest is used to prevent arm removal from the shoulder strap, then the harness safety is improved, but the child experiences discomfort due to an extra layer of clothing and the vest must be carried with the seat

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveharness safetyVSAvoidease of use
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The restraining web is merged with the existing harness system, either as an integrated component or as a retrofit attachment. This eliminates the need for a separate vest, reducing the number of items to carry and manage while maintaining the safety function

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The restraining web serves multiple functions: it prevents arm removal from the shoulder strap, distributes restraining forces across the body, and can be integrated into various child seat designs. This multi-functionality replaces the need for separate protective clothing

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Reliability

If a vest is used to prevent arm removal from the shoulder strap, then the harness safety is improved, but the installation becomes difficult as the vest must be worn by the child and then attached to the seat

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveharness safetyVSAvoidease of installation
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The restraining web is pre-attached to the harness or seat structure during manufacturing, eliminating the need for complex installation steps involving vest donning and attachment. The system is ready for use immediately, simplifying both manufacturing and consumer installation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

4Reliability

If a restraining web covering the area below the armpit and abdomen is used, then the child cannot slip arms out of the shoulder harness, but the web must be securely attached to the harness or seat

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvearm restraintVSAvoidattachment strength
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

Different attachment mechanisms are used at different locations: the first web portion attaches to the shoulder strap near the armpit area, while the second web portion attaches to the seat or harness at the abdomen level. Each attachment point is optimized for its specific location and force requirements

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS20110140489A1Child Support Strap
Publication Date: 2011.06.16 KNIGHT RICHARD JOHN
  • US20110140489A1 patent drawing
  • US20110140489A1 patent drawing
  • US20110140489A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A child restraining system for a vehicle the system comprising: at least one web (60), suitable for attachment to a harness comprising a shoulder strap (14); wherein in use the one or more webs (60) covers an area substantially below the scapula and the same or a different web covers at least part of the side of the abdomen; thereby limiting the ability of a child to slide an arm or a shoulder out from under the strap (14).