Adjustable Child Seat Harness for Upper Torso Restraint

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current juvenile seat restraints in vehicles do not adequately minimize the movement of a child's upper torso relative to the seat back during external forces, potentially increasing the force transferred to the child's head, especially when accommodating occupants of varying sizes.

Innovation Solution

A child restraint system featuring a juvenile seat with a movable headrest and shoulder-belt cover that includes a belt receiver, receiver anchor, and friction pad, which aligns the shoulder belt to minimize movement of the upper torso by engaging with the friction pad, and a headrest-retainer rod that locks or unlocks to adjust the headrest's position, ensuring the shoulder-belt cover moves with the headrest to maintain proper alignment and engagement with the child's torso.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If a fixed shoulder belt position is used in juvenile seats, then the structure is simple, but it cannot accommodate occupants of varying sizes and fails to minimize upper torso movement during external forces

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccommodation of occupants of varying sizesVSAvoidshoulder belt positioning system
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The shoulder-belt cover is made movable and coupled to the headrest-retainer rod, allowing it to move up and down along with the headrest. This dynamic positioning system enables the shoulder belt to adapt to different occupant sizes while maintaining proper alignment, resolving the contradiction between adaptability and structural simplicity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The shoulder-belt cover serves multiple functions: it guides the shoulder belt, provides friction engagement with the occupant's torso, and moves synchronously with the headrest adjustment. This multi-functionality allows a single component to address both adaptability and alignment requirements without significantly increasing overall system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Adaptability or versatility

If the headrest is fixed in position, then the structure is simpler, but it cannot accommodate varying occupant sizes and maintain proper shoulder belt alignment

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadjustment to varying occupant sizesVSAvoidheadrest positioning system
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The headrest is designed as a movable component that can be adjusted up and down along the seat back, coupled through the headrest-retainer rod mechanism. This dynamic positioning allows the headrest to adapt to different occupant sizes, and the coupled shoulder-belt cover moves synchronously to maintain proper belt alignment throughout the adjustment range.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Reliability

If the shoulder belt is not aligned with the upper torso, then the structure is simpler, but the movement of the upper torso cannot be minimized during external forces

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveminimization of upper torso movementVSAvoidshoulder belt alignment mechanism
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The shoulder-belt cover acts as an intermediary component between the shoulder belt and the occupant's upper torso. It features a friction pad that engages with the torso to provide alignment and minimize movement during external forces, while the belt receiver guides the shoulder belt to maintain proper positioning without requiring complex active control mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Reliability

If friction engagement is not used between the shoulder belt and upper torso, then the structure is simpler, but the alignment and movement minimization cannot be achieved

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveshoulder belt alignment stabilityVSAvoidfriction engagement mechanism
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The friction pad material and surface properties are specifically designed to provide optimal friction engagement between the shoulder-belt cover and the occupant's upper torso. By controlling the friction parameter, the system achieves reliable alignment and movement minimization through passive friction-based engagement rather than active mechanical constraints.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This configuration effectively minimizes the movement of the child's upper torso relative to the seat back during external forces, thereby reducing the force transferred to the child's head and accommodating various sizes by adjusting the headrest and shoulder-belt cover alignment.

Implementation Method 1

a friction pad coupled to an inner surface of the belt receiver so that the friction pad is positioned to lie between the belt-receiver and the upper torso of the occupant

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFriction: Friction

Data Source

PatentUS8777322B2Child-restraint harness for juvenile vehicle seat
Publication Date: 2014.07.15 DOREL JUVENILE GROUP INC
  • US8777322B2 patent drawing
  • US8777322B2 patent drawing
  • US8777322B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A child restraint includes a juvenile seat and a child-restraint harness coupled to the juvenile seat. The juvenile seat includes a seat bottom and a seat back extending upwardly from the seat bottom. The juvenile seat also includes a headrest mounted for up-and-down movement on the seat back relative to the seat bottom.