Child Seat Headrest Geometry for Lateral Impact Force Redirection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing child restraints do not effectively manage and reduce the forces experienced by a child's head during a lateral impact event, potentially leading to injury.

Innovation Solution

A child restraint with a headrest featuring energy-redirection means and a head-movement controller that redirects and disperses impact forces across a larger surface area over time, reducing the cumulative force on the child's head.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Object-affected harmful factors

If a traditional headrest design is used, then the structure is simple, but the cumulative force on the child's head during lateral impact cannot be effectively reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecumulative force on child's headVSAvoidheadrest structure
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The headrest is divided into multiple functional surfaces including a first surface, second surface, third surface, and fourth surface, each designed to guide and control head movement during impact. This segmentation allows different portions of the headrest to perform specific force-redistribution functions, transforming a single complex structure into multiple coordinated simpler surfaces.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The headrest incorporates surfaces that extend in multiple dimensions to guide head movement along a controlled path. The first and second surfaces extend in a first direction while the third and fourth surfaces extend in a second direction transverse to the first, creating a three-dimensional force-redistribution system that manages impact forces through spatial guidance rather than单纯 resistance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Object-affected harmful factors

If the headrest redirects forces into side walls and outward forces, then the Head Injury Criterion score decreases, but the device complexity increases due to energy-redirection means

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveHead Injury Criterion scoreVSAvoidenergy-redirection means
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The headrest design converts the harmful cumulative impact force into beneficial distributed forces by guiding the head along a controlled movement path. The energy-redirection means transform the direct impact energy into forces that extend into the side walls and outward forces, distributing the energy across multiple vectors and reducing the concentrated HIC score.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #22Blessing in disguise (Convert harm into benefit)

Solution Approach 2:

The headrest modifies the force parameters during impact by changing the direction and distribution of applied forces. Through its geometric configuration, it transforms a single high-magnitude cumulative force into multiple lower-magnitude force vectors, effectively changing the force parameters to reduce head injury risk.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Duration of action of moving object

If the head-movement controller guides the head to roll across the headrest side wall, then the contact time increases and forces are dispersed, but the structural complexity of the headrest increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontact time during impactVSAvoidheadrest structure
Core Design Contradiction:
Duration of action of moving objectVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The headrest incorporates curved surfaces that guide the head in a rolling motion during impact. The curvature of the first, second, third, and fourth surfaces creates a natural path that encourages rotational movement, increasing contact time by guiding the head along an arc rather than allowing direct linear impact.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #14Spheroidality (Curvature)

Solution Approach 2:

The headrest design enables dynamic head movement during impact rather than static contact. The geometric configuration allows the head to roll and move across different surfaces, creating a time-varying interaction that extends contact duration and continuously redirects forces, making the protection mechanism adaptive to the impact dynamics.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS20260054618A1Child restraint
Publication Date: 2026.02.26 DOREL JUVENILE GROUP INC
  • US20260054618A1 patent drawing
  • US20260054618A1 patent drawing
  • US20260054618A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A child restraint includes a seat bottom and a seat back coupled to the seat bottom. The seat back includes a backrest configured to extend upwardly from the seat bottom and a headrest coupled to the backrest for supporting a head of a child. The headrest includes a rear headrest wall, a first headrest side wall extending outwardly away from the rear headrest wall, and a second headrest side wall extending outwardly away from the rear headrest wall and away from the first headrest side wall.