Child Motion Drive Feedback Control for Smooth Reciprocating Motion

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional child motion devices lack operational adjustability and customization options, leading to inefficacy in soothing or entertaining children due to inaccurate and inefficient control techniques, which result in bumpy motion and rapid battery depletion.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of capacitive sensing technologies for absolute swing angle sensing and automated self-calibration routines, combined with user-defined modes and motor voltage optimization, to provide a secure, comfortable, and adaptable motion control system that adjusts power application based on real-time position data.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If conventional control techniques are used in child motion devices, then the device structure is simple, but the motion accuracy deteriorates resulting in bumpy motion

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemotion accuracyVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements feedback control by continuously monitoring the swing angle sensor data and adjusting motor voltage accordingly. The controller receives feedback about the actual swing position and modifies power application to achieve desired swing characteristics, eliminating the bumpy motion problem while maintaining reasonable system complexity through efficient feedback loops.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces mechanical control mechanisms with electronic control systems. Instead of using purely mechanical linkages and springs to control swing motion, the invention uses electronic sensors, microcontrollers, and motor voltage regulation to achieve precise motion control, improving accuracy while managing complexity through electronic rather than mechanical means.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Use of energy by moving object

If conventional control techniques are used, then the device is easier to manufacture, but energy efficiency deteriorates leading to rapid battery depletion

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebattery efficiencyVSAvoidmanufacturing simplicity
Core Design Contradiction:
Use of energy by moving objectVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies periodic action by controlling motor voltage in cyclical patterns that match the swing motion requirements. Power is applied in timed pulses rather than continuously, with voltage adjustments synchronized to the swing cycle. This periodic control approach significantly improves battery efficiency by eliminating energy waste during deceleration phases while maintaining manufacturing feasibility through standard motor control techniques.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements parameter changes by dynamically adjusting motor voltage levels based on swing position and desired motion characteristics. The controller modifies electrical parameters (voltage, duty cycle) in real-time to optimize energy consumption, achieving extended battery life while using conventional manufacturing processes for the control electronics and motor assembly.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If conventional control techniques are used, then the device complexity is low, but reliability deteriorates resulting in inconsistent motion

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemotion consistencyVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses feedback control to continuously monitor swing angle via sensors and adjust motor voltage to maintain consistent swing characteristics. This closed-loop approach compensates for variations in load, friction, and motor performance, ensuring reliable and repeatable motion while managing system complexity through efficient sensor integration and control algorithms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies preliminary action through self-calibration routines that automatically adjust control parameters before normal operation begins. The system performs initial calibration to establish baseline swing characteristics and stores these parameters for use during operation, ensuring consistent motion from the start without requiring complex manual adjustment mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

4Adaptability or versatility

If the device lacks operational adjustability, then the device complexity is low, but adaptability deteriorates making it ineffective for different children

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperational adjustabilityVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamics by making control parameters adjustable and changeable during operation. The system allows modification of swing speed, amplitude, and timing parameters to adapt to different children's preferences and needs. This dynamic adjustability is achieved through user interface controls that modify motor voltage characteristics in real-time, providing versatility without requiring complex mechanical adjustment mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses parameter changes to provide operational adaptability by allowing users to modify control parameters such as swing speed, amplitude, and timing. The controller adjusts electrical parameters (voltage, frequency, duty cycle) to create different swing patterns suitable for various children, achieving high adaptability through software-based parameter modification rather than complex hardware changes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This solution enhances the reliability and efficiency of child motion devices, ensuring consistent and soothing motion across a wide range of conditions, reducing battery consumption, and allowing for personalized settings to better suit individual children's needs.

Implementation Method 1

one or more capacitive sensors, such as a sensor board with one or more capacitive traces

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCapacitance: Capacitance

Implementation Method 2

the back-EMF technique... an induced voltage is then generated on the winding by the revolving magnet on the motor rotor

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetic Induction: Electromagnetic Induction

Data Source

PatentUS7918742B2Motor drive feedback control for a child motion device
Publication Date: 2011.04.05 GRACO CHILDRENS PROD INC
  • US7918742B2 patent drawing
  • US7918742B2 patent drawing
  • US7918742B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A child motion device includes a motor, a drive system coupled to the motor to produce movement along a motion path having reciprocating strokes, and a sensor responsive to the movement to generate feedback information indicative of the movement. The child motion device further includes a motor control circuit coupled to the sensor to determine, based on the feedback information, when to apply power to the motor during each reciprocating stroke. In some cases, the feedback information is indicative of a position of the motor such that the motor control circuit applies the power to the motor for a duration of time that begins after an end of each reciprocating stroke.