Child-Resistant Closure With Rotation-Blocking Stop

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current child-resistant packaging designs often fail to effectively prevent children from opening containers, as they may not require sufficient multiple actions to remove the closure, posing a risk of accidental access to hazardous products.

Innovation Solution

A child-resistant package incorporating a closure-release control mechanism with a rotation-blocking stop, a movable release element, and an inclined locking tab, which blocks rotation in the counterclockwise direction until a downward force is applied, ensuring the closure remains secured until intentionally released by a consumer.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If a simple closure design is used, then ease of operation is improved, but child-resistant capability deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of closure removalVSAvoidchild-resistant capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The closure system is divided into separate functional components: a closure body, a locking tab with inclined surface, a rotation-blocking stop, and a movable release element. This segmentation allows each component to perform its specific function while collectively providing both child-resistant capability and ease of operation for adults.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The locking tab is designed to be movable rather than fixed, allowing it to pivot between a locked position (blocking rotation) and an unlocked position (allowing rotation). The movable release element dynamically changes the state of the locking mechanism based on user input, enabling both security and easy release.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Reliability

If a complex locking mechanism is used, then child-resistant capability is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvechild-resistant capabilityVSAvoidmechanism complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The locking mechanism is self-actuating during normal closure installation. When the closure is screwed onto the container, the rotation-blocking stop automatically engages with the inclined surface of the locking tab, causing the locking tab to pivot and block further rotation. This eliminates the need for separate locking actions or complex control systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The movable release element serves as an intermediary component that translates simple downward pressure into the pivotal movement of the locking tab. This intermediary mechanism allows adults to easily release the closure by pushing a small element rather than applying complex forces to the entire closure assembly.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Reliability

If a rotation-blocking mechanism is used, then child-resistant capability is improved, but ease of operation deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvechild-resistant capabilityVSAvoidease of closure installation
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The locking tab is positioned and oriented during manufacturing such that it is ready to engage with the rotation-blocking stop during normal closure installation. The inclined surface is pre-configured to automatically convert the rotational motion of closing into the pivotal motion needed to block rotation, eliminating the need for separate locking steps.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS9422091B2Closure for container
Publication Date: 2016.08.23 BERRY PLASTICS CORP
  • US9422091B2 patent drawing
  • US9422091B2 patent drawing
  • US9422091B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A package includes a container and a closure. The container is formed to include a product-storage chamber and a mouth opening into the product-storage chamber. The closure is configured to mount on the container to assume an installed position closing the mouth formed in the container when rotated relative to the container about a vertical axis of rotation in a closure-installation direction.