Child-Resistant Locking Container with Nested Threaded Mechanism

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing storage containers with external locking mechanisms often fail to secure contents over time due to warped plastic or inadequate design, and lack child-resistant features, making them unsuitable for storing hazardous items like food or medicine, especially when accessibility by children is a concern.

Innovation Solution

A child-resistant storage container design featuring a lid with a first and second member, where the second member includes a cog with gaps and a depression, and a body with a threaded portion, allowing for a locked and unlocked state configuration, ensuring secure closure and preventing accidental opening.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If external locking mechanisms with plastic flaps are used, then the container can be easily manufactured and operated, but the locking mechanism becomes unreliable over time due to warping

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelocking mechanism reliabilityVSAvoidlocking mechanism structure
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The locking mechanism is divided into separate functional components: a lid member with locking protrusions, a body member with corresponding recesses, and a threaded engagement system. This segmentation allows each component to be optimized independently for reliability while maintaining manufacturing simplicity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The locking mechanism uses a nested structure where the lid member is disposed within the body member, and the threaded portion is integrated within the body. This nesting reduces the overall footprint and eliminates the need for external complex locking structures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

2Reliability

If simple locking mechanisms are used, then the container is easy to operate, but the container cannot provide child-resistant security

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvechild-resistant securityVSAvoidopening convenience
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The locking mechanism transitions from a static simple latch to a dynamic system requiring sequential actions: rotating the lid member to disengage locking protrusions, then unscrewing the threaded portion. This dynamic sequence provides child-resistant security while remaining operable by adults.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The lid member must first be rotated to disengage the locking protrusions from recesses before the threaded portion can be unscrewed. This preliminary action creates an additional barrier that prevents accidental or unauthorized opening by children.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Reliability

If the locking mechanism is made more secure, then child-resistant security is improved, but the mechanism becomes more obvious and less unobtrusive

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvechild-resistant securityVSAvoidmechanism visibility
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The locking and sealing functions are merged into a single integrated mechanism where the lid member simultaneously provides both security locking and seal engagement. This merging eliminates the need for separate visible locking components, maintaining an unobtrusive appearance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The lid member serves multiple functions: it provides the locking protrusions for security, engages with the seal for containment, and integrates the threaded portion for reversible engagement. This multi-functionality reduces the number of separate components and maintains a clean, unobtrusive design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

4Duration of action of stationary object

If reusable storage containers are used, then time and money are saved, but the containers may not withstand repeated use due to warped plastic

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontainer lifespanVSAvoidlocking security
Core Design Contradiction:
Duration of action of stationary objectVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The container uses composite construction with a lid member and body member that can be made from materials resistant to warping and degradation. The threaded portion and locking mechanisms are designed to maintain their structural integrity through repeated use and cleaning cycles.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Solution Approach 2:

The design anticipates wear and deformation by incorporating a reversible threaded engagement system that can be tightened or adjusted to compensate for minor warping or degradation over time, maintaining locking security throughout the container's lifespan.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #11Beforehand cushioning (Prior cushioning)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The container provides a secure, long-lasting, and child-resistant storage solution that maintains the integrity of its contents by employing a reversible locking mechanism that is both unobtrusive and effective against children and adults alike.

Implementation Method 1

a body threaded portion configured to reversibly engage the second member threaded portion

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectThreading: Screw

Data Source

PatentEP4385917A1Child-resistant locking container and method thereof
Publication Date: 2024.06.19 SUNSHINE ENCLOSURES LLC
  • EP4385917A1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4385917A1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP4385917A1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

The container may comprise a lid, wherein the lid includes a lid sidewall, a lid top surface, and a lid aperture. The container may comprise a first member disposed within the lid, the first member affixed to the lid top surface, the first member comprising a first member sidewall, a first member top surface, and one or more indentations protruding below the first member top surface. Further, the container may comprise a second member disposed within the lid, the second member comprising a second member sidewall, a second member top surface, a second member threaded portion, and a cog disposed atop the second member top surface, the cog comprising one or more gaps between each of one or more teeth. Yet further, the container may comprise a body comprising a body sidewall, a body bottom surface, and a body threaded portion configured to reversibly engage the second member threaded portion.