Child Resistant Packaging Push Button Closure Mechanism

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing child-resistant container designs are difficult for individuals with limited dexterity, such as arthritic patients or the elderly, to open and close, and often fail to provide adequate protection against environmental factors like moisture and air, while also being vulnerable to deformation or damage from excessive force.

Innovation Solution

A child-resistant packaging system featuring a two-piece closure with flexible and fixed lugs, a cap with angled/tapered surfaces, and a depressor button that allows for easy opening and closing with minimal force, using thermoplastic materials and locking threads to secure the cap, while preventing unwanted opening by children.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If traditional multi-step child-resistant features with locking tabs are used, then child-resistant protection is improved, but ease of operation deteriorates for individuals with limited dexterity

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvechild-resistant protectionVSAvoidease of opening and closing
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the operational parameters from multi-step twisting and pressing to a single-step push motion. The closure mechanism transforms the required force application from rotational torque to linear pressure, making it accessible to individuals with limited dexterity while maintaining child-resistant properties through the push-to-open design that requires coordinated force application

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The closure is segmented into distinct functional components: a push button for initiating opening, a cam mechanism for converting linear motion to rotational unlocking, and a seal interface for maintaining protection. This segmentation allows each component to perform its specific function efficiently, simplifying the overall operation while preserving child-resistant capabilities

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Reliability

If excessive force is applied to open the container, then child-resistant protection is improved, but the risk of deformation or damage to the cap and container body increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvechild-resistant protectionVSAvoidstructural integrity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The cam mechanism acts as an intermediary that converts the user's pushing force into controlled rotational motion to disengage the locking tabs. This mechanical intermediary prevents direct application of excessive force to the cap and container body, distributing the stress through the cam's geometric transformation while maintaining the security lock during normal handling

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The design incorporates a cam mechanism that gradually transitions the locking tabs from engaged to disengaged state during the pushing motion. This gradual transition cushions the structural components against sudden force spikes, preventing deformation while maintaining secure locking during normal use and providing controlled release during opening

Inventive Principle:
Principle #11Beforehand cushioning (Prior cushioning)

3Reliability

If locking tabs and multi-step mechanisms are used, then child-resistant protection is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvechild-resistant protectionVSAvoidcomplexity of opening mechanism
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges the sealing function and the child-resistant locking function into a single integrated closure component. The seal interface and locking tabs are combined in one piece that performs both functions simultaneously, eliminating the need for separate sealing mechanisms and reducing overall device complexity while maintaining dual functionality

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Data Source

PatentUS11034490B2Child resistant packaging
Publication Date: 2021.06.15 IV THOUGHT PROD & DESIGN CORP
  • US11034490B2 patent drawing
  • US11034490B2 patent drawing
  • US11034490B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A child-resistant packaging is provided for storing and securing pharmaceuticals, drugs, nutraceutical products, medications, cannabis products and other hazardous materials which are vulnerable to access by the children. The packaging comprises a container, a cap and a depressor to lock the cap with the container or unlock the cap from the container. The container comprises a fixed circumferential ring along an elongated hollow neck having relief cut-outs and hinges to provide depression for a plurality of container lugs. The cap comprises an elongated hollow neck having a plurality of cap lugs towards its open end. The depressor is forced the container lugs inwards in the body of the container and the cap lugs are locked with the container lugs.