Child Resistant Packaging With Segmented Locking Mechanism

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current child-resistant packaging poses difficulties for adults and senior individuals to open, as it requires greater force, which can be problematic for aged individuals while still needing to prevent children from accessing hazardous materials.

Innovation Solution

A child-resistant packaging design featuring a two-component assembly with a locking mechanism that includes tab aperture elements, guide aperture elements, and a lip element, allowing adults to easily access the contents by performing specific movements or steps, while maintaining child safety standards.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If greater force is required to open the packaging, then child safety is improved, but ease of operation deteriorates for aged individuals

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvechild safetyVSAvoidease of opening for adults
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The packaging is divided into two components: an outer housing and an inner insert. The locking mechanism is segmented into discrete elements (tabs, apertures, lips) that can be manipulated individually. This segmentation allows the locking mechanism to provide substantial resistance to child-induced forces while enabling adults to systematically disengage each element through coordinated movements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The locking mechanism transitions from a static, force-resistant state to a dynamic, multi-step disengagement process. The tabs can be pressed inward to release from lips, and the insert can be rotated to different positions. This dynamic behavior allows the packaging to maintain security under random child attempts while providing a controlled sequence for adult opening.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Reliability

If a locking mechanism with multiple steps is used, then child resistance is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvechild resistanceVSAvoidcomplexity of locking mechanism
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The locking mechanism serves multiple functions simultaneously: it provides child resistance through force multiplication, enables adult opening through coordinated movements, and includes visual indicators through the relationship between apertures and tabs. The same structural elements (tabs, lips, apertures) perform both locking and indicating functions, reducing overall device complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The packaging structure itself provides the indication mechanism through the spatial relationship between fixed apertures in the housing and movable tabs on the insert. When tabs are pressed inward, they align with apertures to visually indicate the locked state. This self-indicating feature eliminates the need for separate indicator components, reducing complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS11535432B2Child resistant packaging
Publication Date: 2022.12.27 JOHNS BYRNE LLC
  • US11535432B2 patent drawing
  • US11535432B2 patent drawing
  • US11535432B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Child resistant packaging for storing medicine or medicinal compositions that frustrates or prevents a child's attempts to access the contents while permitting an adult to easily open the packaging through a series of movements or steps in coordination or combination to readily access the contents. The child resistant packaging includes a housing component and an insert component that is configured to slideably interact with an interior space of the housing component between a locked configuration and an unlocked configuration.