Child Resistant Packaging with Coordinated Tab and Aperture Mechanism

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current child-resistant packaging poses difficulties for adults and senior individuals to open, as it requires excessive force, which while ensuring child safety, can be problematic for aged individuals.

Innovation Solution

A child-resistant packaging design featuring a two-component assembly with a locking mechanism that includes tab aperture elements, guide aperture elements, and a lip element, allowing adults to access the contents by performing specific coordinated movements, while maintaining child safety.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If greater force is required to open the packaging, then child safety is improved, but ease of operation deteriorates for aged individuals

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvechild safetyVSAvoidease of opening for adults
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The packaging opening mechanism is segmented into multiple independent steps: first pressing the tab elements through aperture elements, then pulling the insert component outward. This multi-step segmentation prevents children from opening it with simple force while allowing adults to open it through coordinated movements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The packaging transitions from a static locked state to a dynamic unlocking process requiring sequential actions. The tab elements dynamically interact with aperture elements during the opening process, creating a motion-based security mechanism that adapts to user dexterity rather than relying solely on force.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Reliability

If a locking mechanism is implemented, then child resistance is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvechild resistanceVSAvoidcomplexity of locking mechanism
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The locking mechanism uses nested elements where tab elements are positioned within aperture elements, and the insert component is nested within the housing component. This nesting creates an integrated locking system that appears simple externally but provides complex child-resistant functionality through the interaction of nested parts.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

Solution Approach 2:

The locking mechanism is self-service in that the tab elements automatically engage with the aperture elements and the insert component automatically locks into position. No additional locking actions are required by the user beyond the initial pressing and pulling motions, reducing operational complexity while maintaining security.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS12187509B2Child resistant packaging
Publication Date: 2025.01.07 JOHNS BYRNE LLC
  • US12187509B2 patent drawing
  • US12187509B2 patent drawing
  • US12187509B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Child resistant packaging for storing medicine or medicinal compositions that frustrates or prevents a child's attempts to access the contents while permitting an adult to easily open the packaging through a series of movements or steps in coordination or combination to readily access the contents. The child resistant packaging includes a housing component and an insert component that is configured to slideably interact with an interior space of the housing component between a locked configuration and an unlocked configuration.